기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
임플란트 주위염 치료시 치아회분말과 치과용 연석고의 혼합 매식의 골재생 효과
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 임플란트 주위염 치료시 치아회분말과 치과용 연석고의 혼합 매식의 골재생 효과
저자명
최희연,김학균,김수관,문성용,김상렬,박광범,김용민,임성철,김은석,이정훈,Choi. Hee-Yeon,Kim. Hak-Kyun,Kim. Su-Gwan,Moon. Seong-Yong,Kim. Sang-Yeol,Park. Kwang-Bu
간행물명
대한악안면성형재건외과학회지
권/호정보
2008년|30권 2호|pp.142-149 (8 pages)
발행정보
대한악안면성형재건외과학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate histomorphometrically a toothash - plaster of Paris mixture associated with collagen membrane ($Bio-Gide^{(R)}$), regarding new bone formation in the peri-implantitis defects in dogs. Three mandibular molars were removed from 1-year-old mongrel dogs. After 2 months of healing, 2 titanium implants with sandblasted with large grit and acid etched (SLA) surface were installed in each side of the mandible. Experimental peri-implantitis was induced with ligatures after successful osseointegration. Ligatures were removed after identification of bone defect beneath the level of 5th thread of fixture on radiographic image. The mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated and the contaminated fixtures were treated with chlorhexidine and saline. The bone defects were assigned to one of the following treatments: no guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure (group 1), GBR with Bio-$Oss^{(R)}$ and Bio-$Gide^{(R)}$ (group 2), or GBR with toothash - plaster of Paris mixture (TPM) and Bio-$Gide^{(R)}$ (group 3). The dogs were sacrificed after 8 or 16 months. The mean percentages of new bone formation within the limits of the 5 most coronal threads were $17.83{pm}10.69$ (8 weeks) and $20.13{pm}13.65$ (16 weeks) in group 1, $34.25{pm}13.32$ (8 weeks) and $36.33{pm}14.21$ (16 weeks) in group 2, and $46.33{pm}18.39$ (8 weeks) and $48.00{pm}17.78$ (16 weeks) in group 3, respectively. The present study confirmed statistically considerable new bone formation within the threads in group 3 compared with group 1 at 8 and 16 weeks (P<0.05). Although, data analysis did not reveal significant differences between group 2 and 3, the latter showed better results during the period of 8 or 16 weeks. Our findings support the effectiveness of TPM as a GBR material in the treatment of peri-implantitis bone defect.