기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
공학전공 신입생들의 교수-학생 상호작용과 고차원적 학습활동, 진로몰입 간의 성차모형 검증: 공학흥미와 전공 및 학교만족도의 매개효과
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 공학전공 신입생들의 교수-학생 상호작용과 고차원적 학습활동, 진로몰입 간의 성차모형 검증: 공학흥미와 전공 및 학교만족도의 매개효과
  • The Sex Difference in Relationship Model Among Faculty-Students Interactions and Higher-Order Learning, Career Commitment: The Mediating Effects of Engineering Interests and Major and School Satisfaction
저자명
김민선,최보금
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2016년|54권 1호(통권169호)|pp.151-181 (31 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.69MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구에서는 교수-학생상호작용이 공학흥미와 전공 및 학교만족도를 매개로 고차원적 학습활동 과 진로몰입에 직·간접적인 영향을 미치는 인과적 구조모형을 설정하고, 그 적합도와 개별 변수의 영 향력을 살펴보았다. 연구를 위해 서울소재 4년제 대학에 재학 중인 신입생 375명으로부터 자료를 수집 하였다. 구조방정식을 통한 자료 분석 결과, 측정모형이 자료를 적절히 설명하는 것으로 나타났다. 또 한 교수-학생상호작용이 공학흥미와 전공 및 학교만족도를 매개로 고차원적 학습활동과 진로몰입에 영향을 미치는 부분매개모형이 자료에 적합한 것으로 나타났으며, 고차원적 학습활동 변량의 45%, 진 로몰입 변량의 4%를 설명하였다. 다음으로, 부트스트랩(Bootstrapping) 방법을 사용하여 공학흥미와 전공 및 학교만족도의 간접효과 유의성을 검증한 결과 간접효과가 모두 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 구체 적인 경로계수를 살펴보면, 교수-학생 상호작용이 많을수록 공학흥미와 전공 및 학교 만족도가 높았 고, 고차원적 학습활동에 적극적으로 참여하였다. 또한 공학전공에 대한 내적·외적 흥미가 높을수록 고 차원적 학습활동에의 참여와 진로몰입이 높아졌다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 상담실제에 대한 시사점과 후 속연구를 위한 제언을 논하였다.

영문초록

The study examined the possible mediating effects of engineering interests and major and school satisfaction on the relation among faculty-students interactions, higher-order learning, and career commitment. A convenience sample of 375 first year engineering students was employed. First, the measurement and structural model yielded evidence of good fit. In addition, results of bootstrapping revealed significant indirect effects of engineering interests and major and school satisfaction. Unlike expectations, the path coefficients of faculty-students interactions, major and school satisfaction to career commitment were not significant. About 45%, 4% of variance in higher-order learning and career commitment by faculty-students interactions, engineering interests, and major and school satisfaction, respectively. In addition, there were significant gender differences in the model fits. Implications for counseling practice and further research are discussed.

목차

I. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
V. 결론 및 논의
참고문헌

참고문헌 (80건)

  • 강현구, 송지나, 정수지, 이순형(2015). 초기 청소년기 진로결정 수준과 대학 및 전공 만족도가 자아정체감 변화 궤적에 미치는 영향. 고용직업능력개발연구, 8(3), 57-88. (Translated in English) Kang, H. G., Song, J. N., Jung, S. J., & Yi, S. H. (2015). A study on the effects of career decision level in early adolescence and university-major satisfaction on identity developmental trajectories. Journal of Employment and Skills Development, 8(3), 57-88.
  • 고미나, 곽영희(2015). 대학생의 성인애착, 교수-학생 상호작용, 전공만족도와 대학생활 적응 간의 구조적 관계. 청소년시설환경, 13(3), 73-84. (Translated in English) Ko, M. N., & Kwak, Y. H. (2015). The structural analysis of relations among adult attachment, professor-student interaction, major satisfaction and college adjustment for college students. Journal of the Korea Institute of Youth Facility and Environment, 13(3), 73-84.
  • 김경희, 라만교, 권재환(2014). 대학생이 지각한 교수의지지, 학습동기 및 학업적응의 관계모형 검증. 아시아교육연구, 15(1), 45-69. (Translated in English) Kim, K., Na, M., & Kwon, J. (2014). Verification of a relational model among professor’s support, learning motivation, and academic adjustment of college students. Asian Journal of Education, 15(1), 45-69.
  • 김민선, 서영석(2009). 공과대학생들이 지각하는 맥락적 변인과 공학흥미와의 관계: 학업효능감과 결과기대의 매개효과. 상담학 연구, 10(1), 299-321. (Translated in English) Kim, M. S., & Seo, Y. S. (2009). The relationship between perceived contextual factors and technical interests among engineering students: the mediating effects of academic self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Korea Journal of Counseling, 10(1), 299-321.
  • 김민선, 최보금(2014). 맥락적지지와 전공소속감의 관계에서 공학효능감과 결과기대의 매개효과 : 공과대학 신입생들을 중심으로. 교육학연구, 52(4), 111-138. (Translated in English) Kim, M. S., & Choi, B. K. (2014). The Relationship Between Contextual supports and sense of belonging among South Korean first year Engineering students: mediating effects of academic self-efficacy and outcome expectations. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 54(4), 111-138.
  • 김성경(2003). 대학신입생의 스트레스와 학교적응에 관한 연구. 청소년학연구, 10(2), 215-237. (Translated in English) Kim, S. K. (2003). Life stress in freshman and adjustment to college. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 10(2), 215-237.
  • 김성탁(2015. 9. 19). 반수 권하는 수능 … 대학 1학년 때 자퇴·휴학 5만명. 중앙일보 http://news.joins.com/article/18699539에서 2015. 11. 23 검색. (Translated in English) The college scholastic ability test make students study half more year... fifty thousand freshmen drop out or take off (September 19, 2015). Retrieved November 23, 2015, from http://news.joins.com/article/18699539]
  • 김양분, 신혜숙, 남궁지영, 임후남, 김위정, 이재경(2012). 한국교육종단연구2005(Ⅷ)(RR 2012-21). 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Kim, Y., Shin, H., Namgung, J., Lim, H., Kim, W., & Lee, J. (2014). Korean educational longitudical study 2005(Ⅷ). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 김영경(2008). 대학신입생이 지각하는 진로장벽이 진로결정수준과 진로결정효능감에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회: 상담 및 심리치료, 20(4), 1191-1210. (Translated in English) Kim, Y. K. (2008). The Effect of university freshmen’s career barriers on career decsion making levels and carrer decision making self-efficacy. Korean Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20(4), 1191-1210.
  • 김은경(2005). 교수학생 상호작용이 대학생의 성장 및 발달에 미치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 19(4), 877-895. (Translated in English) Kim. E. K. (2005). Effects of student-faculty interaction on college student outcomes and development. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(4), 877-895.
  • 남진열(2010). 대학생의 개인적 직업 관련 요인들과 취업준비실태의 관계 연구. 청소년복지연구, 12(4), 223-242.(Translated in English) Nam. C. Y. (2010). The relationship between individual work factors and preparation of employment in university students. Korean Association of Adolescent Welfare, 12(4), 223-242.
  • 도승이(2009). 공과대학 남녀 학생의 전공 수업관련 심리변인을 예측하는 역할모델 변인 탐구. 아시아교육연구, 10(4), 177-194. (Translated in English) Do, S. (2009). Research on role-models predicting learning related psychological variables between male and female Engineering students. Asian Journal of Education, 10(4), 177-194.
  • 박승철(2012). 공학전공대학생의 입학전형과 중도탈락의 상관관계 분석. 공학교육연구, 15(5), 98-107. (Translated in English) Park, S. C. (2012). A relationship analysis between admission type and drop out of engineering university students. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 15(5), 98-107.
  • 유영란, 강명희(2014). 공학계열 여대생의 진로태도성숙에 영향을 미치는 타인 영향력, 자기주도학습 준비도, 공학 자기효능감 간의 구조적 관계. 아시아교육연구, 15(2), 225-247. (Translated in English) Yoo, Y. R., & Kang, M. (2014). A structural relationship among influence of others, self-directed learning readiness, Engineering self-efficacy and career attitude maturity for female Engineering students. Asian Journal of Education, 15(2), 225-247.
  • 유현숙, 이정미, 최정윤, 김은영, 김민희, 변현정, 최보금, 이길재(2014). 대학의 교수ᐧ학습 질 제고 전략 탐색 연구(Ⅱ)(RR 2014-10). 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Yu, H., Lee, J., Choi, J., Kim, E., Kim, M., Byun, H., Choi, B. K., & Lee, G., (2014). Strategic planning for the advancement of the teaching-learning quality in higher education(Ⅱ). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 이경아, 김진현(2015). 간호대학생의 진로결정 자기효능감과 진로탐색행동 및 진로결정몰입에 대한 인식. 간호과학연구, 12(1), 42-49. (Translated in English) Lee, K. A., & Kim, J. (2015). Nursing students’ awareness of career decision=making self-efficacy, career search behavior, and commitment to career choice. Perspectives in Nursing Science, 12(1), 42-49.
  • 임춘희, 김동익(2011). 공대 여학생의 남자교수 상담에 대한 만족도와 요구도. 공학교육연구, 14(6), 3-15. (Translated in English) Lim, C. H., & Kim, D. I. (2011). Satisfaction and needs of female students in Engineering with counseling men professors. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 14(6), 3-15.
  • 정은이, 박용한 (2008). 대학생들의 교수신뢰와 학습동기 및 대학 생활적응과의 관계. 아시아교육연구, 9(1), 73-93. (Translated in English) Jeong, E. I., & Park, Y. H. (2008). Relations among faculty trust, learning motivation, and school adjustment of college students. Asian Journal of Education, 9(1), 73-93.
  • 조경호(2013). 공학 분야 여성인재 참여 활성화 방안 연구. 한국인사행정학회보, 12(3), 187-212. (Translated in English) Cho, K. H. (2013). Policies and programs for enhancing women participation in Korean Engineering fields. The Korean Society for Public Personnel Administration, 12(3), 187-212.
  • 조규판, 장은영(2010). 대학생의 내외동기, 전공 몰입, 지연행동이 진로탐색행동에 미치는 영향. 진로교육연구, 23(4), 211-228. (Translated in English) Cho, G. P., & Jang, E. Y. (2010). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, major commitment, procrastination on career exploration behavior of university students. The Journal of Career Education Research, 23(4), 211-228.
  • 최길성, 이용창(2013). D대학 사례를 중심으로 한 전문대학 중도탈락 개선 방안. 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 13(11), 979-978. (Translated in English) Choi, K. S., & Lee, Y. C. (2013). Measures to reduce students’ withdrawal rate: a case study on college D. The Korean Contents Society, 13(11), 979-978.
  • 최보금, 조성희(2014). 대학생의 교수학생 및 동료학생간의 상호작용 유형 변화에 따른 자기결정성 동기 분석. 교육학연구, 52(3), 29-54. (Translated in English) Choi, B. K., & Cho, S. H. (2014). The analysis of change in college students’ interaction with faculty and peer students and differences in self-determination motivation. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 52(3), 29-54.
  • 최정윤, 신혜숙(2010). 한국대학에서의 교수-학생 상호작용의 성격과 대학교육 학습성과에 대한 영향 분석: 대학특성 효과 분석을 중심으로. 한국교육, 37(2), 132-154. (Translated in English) Choi, J. Y., & Shin, H. S. (2010). The nature and effects of student-faculty interaction on higher education learning outcomes in Korean universities: Focusing on effects of institutional characteristics. The Journal of Korean Education, 37(2), 132-154
  • 최정윤, 이병식(2009). 대학생의 학습성과에 대한 영향 요인 탐색: 대학의 효과 분석을 중심으로. 교육행정학연구, 27(1), 199-222. (Translated in English) Choi, J. Y., & Rhee, B. S. (2009). Examining factors related to college students' learning outcomes: Focusing on effects of college. The Journal of Educational Administration, 27(1), 199-222.
  • 한우석, 김진경, 이혜경(2013). 대학신입생 학업동기 향상을 위한 동기유발학기프로그램의 효과성 연구: K대학을 중심으로. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 13(7), 522-530. (Translated in English) Han, W., Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2013). Effects of the motivation semester program among university freshmen: focused on K-University. The Korean Contents Society, 13(7), 522-530.
  • 홍지인, 배상훈(2015). 교수-학생 상호작용이 대학생의 대학몰입에 미치는 영향. 교육행정학연구, 33(3), 351-379. (Translated in English) Hong, J. I., & Bae, S. H. (2015). The relationship between student-faculty interaction and institutional commitment of students. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 33(3). 351-379.
  • Anaya, G., & Cole, D. G. (2001). Latina/o student achievement: Exploring the influence of student–faculty interaction on college grades. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 3-14.
  • Astin. A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Beatie, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1-12.
  • Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 8, 7-25.
  • Blustein, D. L., Ellis, M. V., & Devenis. L. E. (1989). The development and validation of a two dimensional model of the commitment to career choice process. Journal of Vocational Bchainor, 35, 342-378.
  • Carrell, S. E., Page, M. E., & West, J. E. (2009). Sex and science: How professor gender gap perpetuates the gender gap. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. 2nd Ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Clark, M. H., & Cundiff, N. L. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of a college freshman seminar using propensity score adjustments. Research in Higher Education, 52, 616-639.
  • Colbeck, C. L., Fairweather, J. S., Brown, D. F., Beach, A. L., & Fingers, E. A. (2001). Enhancing faculty contributions to learning productivity: Final report. Pennsylvania State University Center for the Study of Higher Education, University Park, PA.
  • Cole, D. (2007). Do interracial interactions matter?: An examination of student-faculty contact and intellectual self-concept. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 248-272.
  • Cutrona, C. E., Cole, V., Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Russell, D. W. (1994). Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 369-378.
  • Delaney, A. M. (2008). Why students-faculty interaction matters in the first year experience. Tertiary Education and Management, 14(3), 227-241.
  • Dika, S. L. (2012). Relations with faculty as social capital for college students: Evidence from Puerto Rico. Journal of College Student Development, 53(4), 596-610.
  • Farmer, H. S., Wardrop, J. L., Anderson, M. Z., & Risinger, R. (1995). Women’s career choices: Focus on science, math, and technology careers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 155-170.
  • Goldsmith, D., & Albrecht, T. (1993). The impact of supportive communication networks on test anxiety and performance. Communication Education, 42, 142-158.
  • Hazler, R., & Carney, J. (1993). Student-faculty interactions: An underemphasized dimension of counselor education. Counselor Education & Supervision, 33(2), 80–89.
  • Hazler, R. J., Hoover, J. H., & Oliver, R. (1993). What do kids say about bullying? Education Digest, 58, 16-20
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
  • Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success. Review of Educational Research, 61, 505–532.
  • Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2011). Are the effects of student-faculty interaction dependent on major?: An examination using multi-level modeling. Research in Higher Education, 52(6), 589-615.
  • Komarraju, M., Musulkin, S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2010). Role of student-faculty interactions in developing college studnets' academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 51(3), 332-342.
  • Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 123-155.
  • Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990's. The Review of Higher education, 24(3), 309-332.
  • Lamport, M. A. (1993). Student-faculty informal interaction and the effect on college student outcomes: A review of the literature. Adolescence, 28, 971-990.
  • Lambert, A., Terenzini, P., & Lattuca, L. (2007). More than meets the eye: Curricular and programmatic effects on student learning. Research in Higher Education, 48(2), 141–168.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1996). Career development from a social cognitive perspective. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed., pp. 373—21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of social supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 458-465.
  • Lundberg, C. A., & Schreiner, L. A. (2004). Quality and Frequency of Faculty-Student Interaction as Predictors of Learning: An Analysis by Student Race/Ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 549-565.
  • Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods:Practical application and interpretation (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA.
  • Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Measuring deep approaches to learning using the national survey of student engagement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.
  • Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49, 469-494.
  • Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 545-595.
  • Pascarella, E. T. (2006). How college affects students: Ten directions for future research. Journal of College Student Development, 47(6), 508-520.
  • Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Hibel, J. (1978). Student-faculty interactional settings and their relationship to predicted academic performance. The Journal of Higher Education, 49(5), 450-463.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1977). Patterns of student-faculty informal interaction beyond the classroom and voluntary freshman attrition. The Journal of Higher Education, 48(5), 540-552.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rosenthal, G., Folse, E. J., Allerman, N., Boudreaux, D., Soper, B., & Von Bergen, C. (2000). The one-to-one survey: Traditional versus non-traditional student satisfaction with professors during one-to-one contacts. College Student Journal, 34(6), 315-321.
  • Romsa, K. (2011). Freshman student-faculty interactions and GPA: Predictors of retention and overall satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Minnesota State University, USA.
  • Sax, L. J., Bryant, A. N., & Harper, C. E. (2005). The differential effects of student-faculty interaction on college outcomes for women and men, Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 642-659.
  • Schaefers, K. G., Epperson, D. L., & Nauta, M. M. (1997). Women‘s career development: Can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 173-183.
  • Super, D. E. (1957). The psychology of careers. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Tagg, J. (2003). The learning paradigm college. Boston, MA: Anker.
  • Terenzini, P., & Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student/faculty relationships and freshman year educational outcomes: A further investigation. Journal of College Student Personnel, 21, 521-528.
  • Thompson, M. D. (2001). Informal student-faculty interaction: Its relationship to educational gains in Science and Mathematics among community college students. Community College Review, 29(1), 35-57.
  • Ting, S. (1997). Estimating academic success in the 1st year of college for specially admitted White students: A model combining cognitive and psychological predictors. Journal of College Students Development, 38(4), 401-409.
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and curse of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Trolian, T. L., Jach, E. M., Hanson, J. M., & Pascarella, E. T. (In Press). Influencing academic motivation: The effects of student-faculty interaction. Journal of College Student Development.
  • Vogt, C. M. (2008). Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 27-36.
  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie-Gauld, M. (2005). It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people: The role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 707-722.
  • Wolf-Wendel, L. E., Tuttle, K., & Keller-Wolff, C. M. (1999). Assessment of a freshman summer transition program in an open-admissions institution. Journal of the First-Year Experience, 11, 7–32.
  • Woodside, B. M., Wong, E. H., & Wiest, D. J. (1999). The effect of student-faculty interaction on college students’ academic achievement and self concept. Education, 119, 730-733.
구매하기 (6,000)