본연구에서는과학과관련된사회ㆍ윤리적문제(SSI)를도입한과학수업에서SSI에대한중학생 들의의사결정유형을분석하고, SSI를도입한과학수업이학생들의인성과가치관의변화에어떠한 영향을미치는지알아보고자하였다.이를위해서울소재의중학교3학년118명을실험집단, 104명 을비교집단으로선정하였다. 실험집단을대상으로 ‘우주개발’, ‘성장호르몬’, ‘기후변화’를주제로 SSI 수업을한학기에걸쳐진행하였고,비교집단을대상으로같은기간동안교과서중심의수업을 진행하였다. 학생들이SSI 수업중작성한댓글쓰기활동지를사용하여의사결정유형을분석하였 다. 그리고검사지를사용하여사전ㆍ사후검사를실시하여인성과가치관의변화를분석하였다. 연구결과는다음과같다.첫째, SSI주제에대한학생들의의사결정은관점의다양성과의사결 정의일관성이라는두요인에따라4가지(A, B, C, D)유형으로분류되었다.둘째, SSI 수업을진 행할수록학생들이의사결정을 할때다양한관점을고려하고일관된의사결정을하는학생들의 비율이증가하는경향성을나타냈다.셋째,검사지를분석한결과, SSI수업을통해학생들의인성 과가치관이통계적으로유의미한향상을나타냈다(p < .05).특히‘사회ㆍ도덕적공감’요소의하위 요소인‘다양한관점에대한포용’과‘공감적배려’에서큰점수차이를보였다.
This study examined the types of decision-making during SSI classes and any changes in students’ character and values after SSI classes in the middle school. One hundred eighteen third grade students in a middle school in Seoul were selected as the experimental group and 104 students were selected as the comparison group. The experimental group received three SSI classes while the comparison group received text-oriented classes. SSI topics applied in the science classes were ‘space development’, ‘growth hormone’, and ‘climate change’. For the analysis of the types of decision-making and any changes in the students’ character and values, reply-writing papers and questionnaires were used respectively. The results of this study are follows: First, students were classified into 4 types(A, B, C, D) according to the multiple perspectives and the consistency of decision-making. Second, as the experiences of SSI class increased, students were consistent in decision-making in consideration of the multiple perspectives. Third, the experimental group that experienced SSI classes showed a statistically significant improvement in the character and values (p < .05), especially in ‘perspective-taking’ and ‘empathic concerns’ sub-factors.
I. 서 론 II. 연구 방법 및 내용 III. 연구 결과 및 논의 IV. 결론 및 제언 참고문헌
