기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
현대애착이론과 놀이의 역동 - 놀이치료 적용을 중심으로 -
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 현대애착이론과 놀이의 역동 - 놀이치료 적용을 중심으로 -
  • Modern Attachment Theory and the Dynamics of Play - Focusing on the Application to Play Therapy -
저자명
이순행
간행물명
인간발달연구KCI
권/호정보
2016년|23권 3호(통권67호)|pp.1-28 (28 pages)
발행정보
한국인간발달학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.84MB)
주제분야
사회과학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구는 대인관계신경생물학을 중심으로 현대애착이론과 놀이의 역동을 살펴보고, 이들 이론들의 중첩영역인 놀이치료 장면에 어떻게 적용할 수 있는지를 고찰해 보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 문헌자료를 이용해, 전통적인 애착 이론을 토대로 정서적 각성의 상호조절을 강 조하는 현대애착이론의 대인관계신경생물학 접근을 살펴보았으며, Panksepp이론과 Porges의 다미주신경이론, Kestly의 이론을 중심으로 대인관계신경생물학에 기반을 둔 놀이의 역동을 살펴보았다. 이들 이론들을 놀이치료 장면에 적용하면, 치료사는 아동 내담자의 정서적 각 성을 인식하고 그에 맞추어 조율하며 비언어적으로 의사소통하는 것이 우선되어야 한다. 이 렇게 될 때 비로소 안전한 놀이 관계 및 놀이공간이 형성되고 아동은 자신의 마음을 탐색 하는 진정한 놀이를 할 수 있다. 또한 치료사는 포괄적인 관계를 형성하여 의식에서 배제되 어 암묵적으로 실연되는 내담 아동의 정서적 각성을 이끌어내고 조절하는 것이 요구된다. 이는 정서적 각성 및 조절에 기초한 치료적 관계가 단순히 치료적 동맹을 위한 초기 단계 에 그치는 것이 아니라 치료 회기 전반에 걸쳐서 가장 중점적으로 다루어져야 하는 측면임 을 시사한다.

영문초록

Based on a literature review, this study explores the modern attachment theory of emotional arousal and regulation paradigm and examines the dynamics of play from the perspective of interpersonal neurobiology whose framework has been built on various theories such as Panksepp’s affective-motivational theory, Porges’s polyvagal theory, and Kestly’s play theory. Applying the framework to the practice of play therapy, this study sheds light in that therapist should be attuned to the arousal level of a child client when playing, and be able to communicate with the client nonverbally. Then, a safe relationship and a space for playing are created, which leads to the child client playing in order to explore his mind. Therapist also needs to build an inclusive relationship in order to draw on and to help regulate the affective arousal of the child client which is enacted implicitly. These processes are required because a therapeutic relationship is not only the first requirement for a therapeutic alliance in the early stages of treatment but also an essential element over the span of treatment in order to create a real therapeutic change.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 현대 애착이론
Ⅲ. 놀이의 신경생물학
Ⅳ. 현대 애착이론과 놀이 역동의 접목: 놀이치료를 중심으로
Ⅴ. 제안 및 함의
참고문헌

참고문헌 (60건)

  • 이정모 (2010). ‘체화된 인지’ 접근과 학문간 융합: 인지과학 새 패러다임과 철학의 연결이 주는 시사. 철학사상, 38, 27-66.
  • 이종희, 조은진, 김송이 (2009). 놀이. 아동학회지, 30(6), 309-321.
  • 조미정, 최태산 (2011). 아동의 놀이성 군에 따른 사회적 유능성 연구. 인간발달연구, 18(3), 37-51.
  • 최태산, 조미정 (2010). 아동의 놀이성이 자기조절력에 미치는 영향. 인간발달연구, 17(4), 153-172.
  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: infant care and the growth of love. Oxford, England: Johns Hopkins Press
  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37-46.
  • Berlyne, D. (1969). Laughter, humor, and play. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol 3). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Heinemann.
  • Boston Change Process Study Group. (2013). Enactment and the emergence of new relational organization. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 61. 727-749.
  • Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical application of attachment theory. New York: Basic Books.
  • Brown, S., & Vaughan, C. (2009). Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imaginations, and invigorates the soul. New York: Avery.
  • Caillois, R. (1994). 놀이와 인간. 이상률(역). 서울: 문예출판사. (원본 출간일, 1958)
  • Carlson, V., Cicchetti, D., Barnett, D., & Braunwald, K. (1989). Disorganized/ Disoriented attachment relationships in maltreated infant, Developmental Psychology, 25, 525-531.
  • Chethik, M. (2003). 아동의 심리치료. 백용매, 천성문(역). 서울: 학지사. (원본 출간일, 2000).
  • Cozolino, L. (2006). The neuroscience of human relationship: Attachment and the developing social brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  • Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2004). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York: Karnac Books.
  • Gaskill, L. R. (2007). Neurosequential model of therapeutics protocol for core elements of the therapeutic program. The Child Trauma Academy.
  • Heath, R. (1996). Exploring the mind-body relationship. Baton Rouge, LA: Moran Printing.
  • Hong, R., & Mason, C. M.. (2016). Becoming a neurobiologically-informed play therapist. International Journal of Play Therapy, 25(1) pp. 35-44.
  • Hughes, F. P. (2003). 놀이와 아동 발달. 김광웅, 유미숙, 박영애, 유가효, 최영희, 방은령(역). 서울: 시그마프레스. (원본 발간일, 1999).
  • Huizinga, J. (2010). 호모 루텐스: 놀이하는 인간. 이종인(역). 서울: 연암서가. (원본 발간일 1950).
  • Jaffe, J,. Beebe, B,. Feldstein, S,. Crown, C. L., & Jasnow, M. D. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: coordinated timing in development. Monograph Society for Research in Child Development. 66(2), 1-132.
  • Kestly, T. A. (2014). The interpersonal neurobiology of play: Brain-building interventions for emotional well-being. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  • Kestly, T. A. (2016). Presence and play: Why mindfulness matters. International Journal of Play Therapy, 25(1), pp. 14-23.
  • Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94(4), 412-426.
  • Lyons-Ruth, K. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19(3), 282-289.
  • Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). Two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representations, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 19, 576-617.
  • Main, M. (2000). The organized categories of infant child, and adult attachment: Flexible vs. inflexible attention under attachment- related stress. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48(4), 1055-109
  • Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1994). Adult attachment scoring and classification system. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Main, M., Hesse, E., & Kaplan, N. (2005). Predictability of attachment behavior and representational processes. In K. E. Grossmann, K. Grossmann, & E. Waters (Eds.). Attachment from infancy to adulthood: Lessons from longitudinal studies (pp. 245-304). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1-2), 66-104.
  • Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth strange situation. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 121-160). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Marks-Tarlow, T. (2012). The play of psychotherapy. American Journal of Play, 4(3), 353-377.
  • Moore, G, A., & Calkins, S. D. (2004). Infants' vagal regulation in the still-face paradigm is related to dyadic coordination of mother-infant interaction. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1068-1080.
  • Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Panksepp, J. (2009). Brain emotional systems and qualities of mental life: From animal models of affect to implications for psychotherapeutics. In D. Fosha, D. Siegel, & M. Solomon (Eds.), The healing power of emotion: Affective neuroscience, development, and clinical practice (pp. 1-26). New York, NY: Norton.
  • Panksepp, J., & Biven, L. (2012). The archaeology of mind: Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Papousek M. (2007). Communication in early infancy: an arena of intersubjective learning. Infant Behavior and Development. 30(2), 258-66.
  • Pellis, S., Pellis, V., & Bell, H. (2010). The function of play in the development of the social brain. American Journal of Play, 2(3), 278-296.
  • Porges, S. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundation of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. New York: Norton.
  • Sander, L. W. (2002). Thinking differently. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(1), 11-42.
  • Schore, A. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: Norton.
  • Schore, A. (2012). The science of the art of psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.
  • Schore, J., & Schore, A. (2008). Modern attachment theory: The central role of affect regulation in development and treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal. 36, 9-20.
  • Siegel, D. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York: Guildford Press.
  • Siviy, S. M. (2010). Play and adversity: How the playful mammalian brain withstands threats ans anxieties. American Journal of Play, 2(3), 297-314.
  • Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.
  • Stewart, A. L., Field, T. A., & Echterling, L. G., (2016). Neuroscience and the magic of play therapy. International Journal of Play Therapy, 25(1), 4-13.
  • Suter, S. E., Huggenberger, H. J., & Schachinger, H. (2007). Cold pressor stress reduces left cradling preference in nulliparous human females. Stress, 10(1), 45-51.
  • Trevarthen, C. (1993). The self born in intersubjectivity: The psychology of an infant communicating.. In U. Neisser (Ed). The perceived self: Ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge. Emory symposia in cognition, 5 (pp. 121-173). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tronick, E. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist. 44(2), 112-11.
  • Tronick, E. (2004). Why is connection with others so critical? The formation of dyadic states of consciousness and the expansion of individuals’ states of consciousness: Coherence governed selection and the co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning making. In J. Nadel & D. Muir (Eds.), Emotional development (pp. 293-315). New York: Oxford University Press
  • Tronick, E. Z., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 1-13.
  • Weinberg, M. K., & Tronick, E. Z. (1996). Infant affective reactions to the resumption of maternal interaction after the still-face. Developmental Development, 67, 905-914.
  • Wheatley-Crosbie, J. R. (2006). Healing traumatic reenactment: Psyche’s return from soma’s underworld. The USA Body Psychotherapy Journal, 5(2), 10-27.
  • Wheeler, N, D., & Taylor, D. (2016). Integrating interpersonal neurobiology with play therapy. International Journal of Play Therapy, 25(1). 24-34.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1997). 놀이와 현실. 이재훈(역). 서울: 한국심리치료연구소. (원본 발간일, 1971).
  • Wolff, M.. D., & van IJzendoorn. M. (1995). Sensitivity and attachment. A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68, 571-591.
구매하기 (5,700)