기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
부정적 피드백 상황에서 논리 및 창의적 사고 과제에 따라 성취목표와 인지적 정서조절전략이 과제흥미, 과제노력, 과제수행에 미치는 영향 비교
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 부정적 피드백 상황에서 논리 및 창의적 사고 과제에 따라 성취목표와 인지적 정서조절전략이 과제흥미, 과제노력, 과제수행에 미치는 영향 비교
  • The effects of achievement goals and cognitive emotion regulation on task enjoyment, efforts, and performance in logical and creative thinking tasks under the negative feedback
저자명
이현주
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2016년|54권 4호(통권172호)|pp.45-72 (28 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(1.02MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구의 목적은 인지적 정서조절전략(적응적, 비적응적)의 과제흥미, 과제노력, 과제수행에 대한영향이 성취목표(타인접근, 자기접근, 과제접근)에 따라 다르게 나타나는 지를 확인하고, 이러한 상호작용효과가 과제유형(논리, 창의)에 따라 차별화되는 지를 확인하는 것이다. 본 실험연구에 대학생280명이 참여하였으며 모든 과정은 컴퓨터 상에서 진행되었다. 인지적 정서조절전략에 대한 조작은자신의 과거 실패 경험과 현재 과제수행에 대한 부정적 피드백에 관하여 적응적(부적응적) 정서조절전략을 사용하는 작문으로 이루어졌다. 부정적 피드백으로서 자신의 기대보다 낮은 수행을 통보받고이에 따라 교수자의 화가 내포된 피드백을 제공하였다. 그 결과, 첫째, 논리적 사고 과제보다 창의적사고 과제에서 과제흥미와 과제노력이 높게 나타났고, 부적응적 정서조절전략보다 적응적 정서조절전략을 사용할 때 과제흥미와 과제수행이 높았다. 둘째, 자기접근(자기성장)목표와 과제접근(최고수행)목표보다 타인접근(상대우위)목표에서 창의적 과제수행이 낮게 나타났으나 논리적 과제에서는 그 차이가 유의하지 않았다. 마지막으로, 상대우위목표를 가지고 부적응적 정서조절전략을 사용할 때, 창의적과제에서 과제흥미와 과제수행이 낮았으며, 논리적 과제에서 과제노력과 과제수행이 낮았다. 이와 같은 연구결과를 바탕으로 적응적 정서조절에 대한 훈련 및 자기성장목표와 최고수행목표에 대한 교실구조 등을 논의하였다.

영문초록

The purpose of the study was to explore whether the effects of cognitive emotion regulation (adaptive vs. maladaptive) on task enjoyment, effort, and performance were differentiated by achievement goals (other-approach vs. self-approach vs. task-approach) and task type (logical thinking vs. creative thinking). First, the results showed that task enjoyment and task efforts were higher for participants who did creative thinking task than those who did logical thinking task; task enjoyment and performance were lower for the other-approach (comparative superiority) goal condition. Second, participants in the other-approach goal condition showed lower performance in creative thinking task compared to self-approach (self-growth) goal and task-approach (best performance) goal conditions; whereas there were no significant differences for participants who did logical thinking task. Third, the participants in the other-approach goal condition showed lower task enjoyment and performance in creative thinking task, and lower task efforts and performance in logical thinking task by using maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies compared to using adaptive strategies; whereas there were no significant differences for the other-approach goal and task-approach goal conditions by cognitive emotion regulation strategies.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 결론 및 논의
참고문헌

참고문헌 (54건)

  • 박명신·한상훈·김영미(2014). 대학생의 일상적 창의성과 리더십 및 정서조절전략이 문제해결능력에 미치는 영향. 청소년복지연구, 16(1), 197-225. (Translated in English) Park M., Han, S., & Kim, Y. (2014). A Study of the Effects of College Student Everyday Creativity, Leardership and Emotion Regulation Strategies on Problem-solving Ability. Journal of Youth Welfare, 16(11), 197-225.
  • 박원주(2011). 자아탄력성이 내재화 및 외현화 문제에 미치는 영향: 인지적 정서조절과 긍정및 부정정서의 매개효과. 박사학위논문. 연세대학교. Translated in English) Park, Y. (2011). The effect of the ego-resiliency on internalizing and externalizing problems : mediating effects of cognitive emotion regulation and positive, negative emotion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Yonsei University.
  • 박중길·문익수(2013). 체육 상황에서 3×2 성취목표 모델: 확장적용 및 비교문화적 반복검증. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 24(1), 175-192. (Translated in English) Park, J., & Moon I. (2013). A 3×2 Achievement goal model in the physical education setting: The extended application and cross-cultural replication. Korean Journal of Sports Psychology, 24(11), 175-192.
  • 도승이·손수경·변준희·임지윤(2011). 한국어판 성취정서 질문지(K-AEQ) 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 25(4), 945-970. (Translated in English) Do. S.-L., Son, S.-K., Byun, J.-H., & Lim, J.-Y.(2011). Development and Construct Validation of the Korean Achievement Emotions Questionnaire(K-AEQ). Korean J ournal of Educational Psychology, 25(4), 945-970.
  • 양명희(2009). 성취목표지향성이 학습결과에 미치는 영향: 정서의 조절효과. 교육심리연구, 23(1), 51-71. (Translated in English) Yang., M. (2009). Emotion as moderator on the relations between achievement goal orientation and academic outcomes, Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(1), 51-71.
  • 오숙영(2008). 정서지능, 리더십, 창의성, 학업성취간의 관계에 대한 연구. 박사 학위논문. 고려대학교 (Translated in English) Oh, S. (2008). The Study on the relationship among emotional intelligence, leadership, creativity, and achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Korea University.
  • 정은이·박용한(2004). 일상적 창의성과 대학생의 스트레스 및 스트레스 대처 양식과의 관계. 교육학연구, 42(4), 379-399. (Translated in English) Park. Y., & Jung, E. (2004). The relationships between everyday creativity, stress and stress ooping strategies of college students. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 379-399
  • 정지영·김종남(2011). 중학생의 우울과 지각된 부모양육태도, 인지적 정서조절전략, 행동억제 기질 간의 관계: 성차를 중심으로. 청소년학연구, 18(12), 227-254. (Translated in English) Jung, J., & Kim., J. (2011). Gender differences in relationships between perceived parental behavior, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, behavioral inhibition and depression in early adolescents. Korean J ournal of Youth Studies, 18(2), 227-254.
  • 최병연(2001). 목표지향성이 성취관련 신념과 노력에 미치는 영향. 한국교육, 28(1), 164-180. (Translated in English) Choi, B. (2001). Influence of goal orientation on achievement related beliefs and effort. The J ournal of Korean Education, 28(1), 164-180.
  • 한윤영·송인섭(2012). 통찰문제의 재구조화를 활용한 문제발견 검사로서의 K-RAT (Korean-Restructuring Test) 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 26(4), 1023-1051. (Translated in English) Han, Y.-Y., & Song, I.-S (2012). A study on development and validation of K-RAT as problem finding test using insight problem`s restructuring. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(4), 1023-1051.
  • 한윤영(2013). 문항반응이론을 적용한 한국형 재구조화연합검사 (K-RAT) 의 문항탐색. 영재와 영재교육, 12(2), 93-113 (Translated in English) Han. Y.-Y. (2013). An item detection of the Korean-Restructuring Association Test (K-RAT) applying item response theory. The Gifted and Gifted Education, 12(2), 93-113.
  • Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811-831.
  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A Meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779-806.
  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129-148.
  • Cicchetti, D., Ackerman, B. P., & Izard, C. E. (1995). Emotions and emotion regulation in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 7(1), 1-10.
  • Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  • Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25-38.
  • DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1096-1127.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
  • Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3×2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648.
  • Forgeard, M. J. C. (2011). Mood and creativity: Unpacking the puzzle. In L. DellaPietra (Ed.), Perspectives on Creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 188-211). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300-319.
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought?action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313-332.
  • Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: A comparative study of five specific samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1659-1669.
  • Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1311-1327.
  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697.
  • Getz, I., Lubart, T., & Russ, S. (1999). The emotional resonance model of creativity: Theoretical and practical extensions. In S. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience and psychological adjustment(pp. 41-56). Philadelphia: Brunner / Mazel
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1-21.
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
  • Isen, A. M. (2008). Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 548-573). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 1-12.
  • Johnson, M. L., & Kestler, J. L. (2013). Achievement goals of traditional and nontraditional aged college students: Using the 3×2 achievement goal framework. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 48-59.
  • Kaufmann, G. (2003). Expanding the mood - Creativity equation. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 131-135.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Louro, M. J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 174-193.
  • Martin, L. L., & Stoner, P. (1996). Mood as input: What we think about how we feel determines how we think. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation(pp. 279-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220-232.
  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115-135.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students' learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48.
  • Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2007). Explanatory style and emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 159-179): Guilford publications.
  • Radosevich, D. J., Vaidyanathan, V. T., Yeo, S.-y., & Radosevich, D. M. (2004). Relating goal orientation to self-regulatory processes: A longitudinal field test. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 207-229.
  • Schmeichel, B. J., Volokhov, R. N., & Demaree, H. A. (2008). Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. J ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1526-1540.
  • Schmitz, T. W., De Rosa, E., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). Opposing influences of affective state valence on visual cortical encoding. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(22), 7199-7207.
  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
  • Schutz, P. A., Hong, J. Y., Cross, D. I., & Osbon, J. N. (2006). Reflections on investigating emotion in educational activity settings. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 343-360.
  • Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. A. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289-308). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
  • Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2-3), 25-52.
  • Tyson, D. F., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Hill, N. E. (2009). Regulating Debilitating Emotions in the Context of Performance: Achievement Goal Orientations, Achievement-Elicited Emotions, and Socialization Contexts. Human Development, 52(6), 329-356.
  • Van Kleef, G. A., Anastasopoulou, C., & Nijstad, B. A. (2010). Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1042-1048.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Test anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 159-183.
  • Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The State of the art. New York: Plenum.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.
구매하기 (5,700)