기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Effective Thyroxine Ratio(E.T.R)의 진단적(診斷的) 가치(價値)
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Effective Thyroxine Ratio(E.T.R)의 진단적(診斷的) 가치(價値)
  • Diagnostic Evaluation of Effective Thyroxine Ratio
저자명
이명철,최성재,노흥규,이홍규,고창순,이문호,Lee. Myung-Chul,Choi. Sung-Jae,Ro. Heung-Kyu,Lee. Hong-Kyu,Koh. Chang-Soon,Lee. Mun-Ho
간행물명
大韓核醫學會誌
권/호정보
1975년|9권 2호|pp.13-22 (10 pages)
발행정보
대한핵의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of the ETR test as compared to other thyroid function tests in normal persons, patients with thyroid disorders and patients with alterations of thyroxine-binding proteins. The ETR values were obtained from 35 cases as normal control, 63 hyperthyroid patients, 56 euthyroid patients, 23 hypothyroid patients, 10 pregnant women, 5 women taking oral contraceptive medication, 8 liver cirrhosis patients and 4 nephrotic syndrome patients. The results obtained were as follows. 1. The mean value of ETR obtained from the normal controls was $0.99{pm}0.06$. 2. The mean ETR values of various thyroid states were $1.25{pm}0.16$ in hyperthyroidism, $0.99{pm}0.08$ in euthyroidism and $0.82{pm}0.05$ in hypothyroidism and significant difference was found between these groups. 3. Seven out of 63 hyperthyroid patients(11.1%) and 2 out of 23 hypothyroid patients(8.7%) had ETR values within normal range and among the 56 euthyroid patients 6(10.7%) had ETR values outside normal range, so the diagnostic compatibility of ETR was 89.4% in thyroid diseases. 4. Even though the ETR value was well correlated with $^{131}I$-thyroid uptake rate, serum $T_3$ resin uptake rate and serum $T_4$, a high positive correlation was found (r=0.79) between ETR and $T_7$. 5. The mean ETR values from patients with alteration in TBG binding capacity were $0.99{pm}0.05$ in pregnant women, $0.98{pm}0.04$ in women with oral contraceptive medication, $1.04{pm}0.09$ in liver cirrhosis patients and $0.94{pm}0.02$ in nephrotic syndrome patients and most of them (85.2%) had ETR values within normal range. Our results, therefore, suggests that the ETR estimation does offer the simplest and most reliable single procedure for the screening and diagnosis of various thyroid diseases as a indirect indicator of serum-free thyroxine concentration without essential influence of changes in the thyroxine-binding proteins in serum.