- 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 이용실태(利用實態) 조사분석(調査分析)(II) -고장(故障) 및 수리(修理)에 관(關)하여-
- ㆍ 저자명
- 홍종호,이채식,Hong. Jong Ho,Lee. Chai Shik
- ㆍ 간행물명
- 한국농업기계학회지
- ㆍ 권/호정보
- 1981년|6권 1호|pp.28-38 (11 pages)
- ㆍ 발행정보
- 한국농업기계학회
- ㆍ 파일정보
- 정기간행물| PDF텍스트
- ㆍ 주제분야
- 기타
동력경운기(動力耕耘機)의 효율적(效率的)인 이용(利用)과 고장(故障)으로 인(因)한 문제점(問題點)과 그에 따른 대책(對策)을 강구(講究)하기 위(爲)한 기초자료(基礎資料)를 제시(提示)코저 전국(全國) 8개도 278농가(農家)를 대상(對象)으로 동력경운기(動力耕耘機)의 각종(各種) 고장(故障) 및 수리실태(修理實態)를 조사분석(調査分析)한 결과(結果)는 다음과 같다. 가. 고장빈도(故障頻度) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機)의 대당(臺當) 년간(年間) 고장발생(故障發生) 빈도(頻度)는 9.05회(回)이었으며 평균(平均) 39.1시간(時間) 작업(作業)에 1회(回)의 고장(故障)이 발생(發生)되었다. 고장빈도(故障頻度)가 가장 높았던 곳은 점화연료공급계통(點火燃料供給系統)으로서 2.02회(回)로 전체고장(全體故障)의 22.3%를 차지하였고, 그 다음이 부속작업기(附屬作業機) 시린더계통(系統), 주행장치등(走行裝置等)의 순서(順序)로 나타났다. (2) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 사용년수별(使用年水別) 고장(故障) 발생빈도(發生頻度)는 구입후(購入後) 6년(年) 이하(以下) 경과(經過)된 기계(機械)에서 37.7시간(時間) 사용(使用)에 1회(回)의 고장(故障)이 발생(發生)된 것으로 나타나 가장 높았고 그 다음이 구입후(購入後) 2년(年) 미만(未滿)된 기계(機械)로서 38.6시간(時間) 작업(作業)에 1회(回)이 고장(故障)이 발생(發生)되었다. (3) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 기종별(機種別) 고장(故障) 발생빈도(發生頻度)는 석유(石油)엔진이 36.3시간(時間) 작업(作業)에 1회(回)의 고장(故障)이 발생(發生)되어 디젤엔진의 42.8시간(時間)보다 높았고 마력별(馬力別)로는 석유(石油)엔진의 경우(境遇) 8마력(馬力)이 10마력(馬力)보다 고장(故障) 발생빈도(發生頻度)가 높게 나타났다. (4) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 월별(月別) 고장(故障) 발생빈도(發生頻度)는 10월(月)에 가장 낮아 51.5시간(時間) 작업(作業)에 1회(回)의 고장(故障)이 발생(發生)되었고 그 다음이 6월로 49.7시간(時間) 작업(作業)에 1회(回)의 고장(故障)이 발생(發生)된 것으로 나타나 작업시간(作業時間)이 많았을 때 고장(故障) 발생빈도(發生頻度)는 상대적(相對的)으로 적었던 것으로 나타났다. 나. 수리장소(修理場所) (1) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 고장시(故障時)의 수리장소(修理場所)는 자가수리(自家修理)가 평균(平均) 45.3%이었고 공장수리(工場修理)가 54.7%로 나타나 공장수리(工場修理)가 자가수리(自家修理)보다 많았다. (2) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 사용년수별(使用年數別) 수리장소(修理場所)는 구입후(購入後) 경과년수(經過年數)가 길어질수록 공장수리(工場修理)보다 자가수리(自家修理)가 많아지는 것으로 나타났다. (3) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 자가수리율(自家修理率)은 디젤엔진이 석유(石油)엔진보다 높았으며 석유(石油)엔진에서는 10마력(魔力)이 디젤엔진에서는 8마력(魔力)이 높았다. (4) 고장부위별(故障部位別) 자가수리(自家修理) 비율(比率)은 조향장치(操向裝置)가 가장 높아 66.7%였으며 그 다음이 점화연료계통(點火燃料系統)인 것으로 나타났고 자가수리비율(自家修理比率)이 가장 낮는 곳은 부속작업기(附屬作業機)로서 26.5%에 불과(不過)하였다. 다. 고장원인(故障原因) (1) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 고장원인(故障原因)은 기계(機械)의 노후(老朽)에 의(依)한 고장(故障)이 년간(年間) 대당(臺當) 5.18회(回)로 전체(全體)의 57.2%를 차지하여 가장 많았고 정비불량(整備不良)과 과부하(過負荷)로 인(因)한 고장(故障)이 전체(傳遞)의 37.7%이었다. (2) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 구입후(購入後) 2년(年) 미만(未滿)의 기종(機種)에서는 정비불량(整備不良)으로 인(因)한 고장(故障)이 많았던 반면(反面) 노후(老朽)로 인(因)한 고장(故障)이 적었다. (3) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 고장원인(故障原因)은 기종별(機種別) 마력별(馬力別) 공(共)히 노후(老朽)로 인(因)한 고장(故障)과 과부하(過負荷)로 인(因)한 고장(故障)이 대부분(大部分)이었으며 특히 석유(石油) 5마력(馬力)엔진에서는 과부하(過負荷)로 인(因)한 고장(故障)이 월등히 높았다. (4) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 부위별(部位別) 고장원인(故障原因)은 시린더 계통(系統)과 주행장소(走行場所)의 고장(故障)에서는 주(主)로 노후(老朽)에 의(衣)한 원인(原因)이 많았던 반면(反面) 점화연료계통(點火燃料系統)의 고장(故障)에서는 정비불량(整備不良)으로 인한 고장(故障)이 많았다. 라. 수리비율(修理(比率) (1) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 년간(年間) 대당(臺當) 수리비(修理費)는 34,509원이었고 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 1시간(時間) 수업당(修業當) 평균(平均) 수리비(修理費)는 97원이었다. (2) 동력경운기(動力耕耘機) 기종별(機種別) 수리비(修理費)는 석유(石油)엔진이 40,697원으로 디젤엔진의 28,322원보다 훨씬 많았다. (3) 동력..
A survey has been conducted to investigate the presents of breaks down and repair of power tiller for efficient use. Eight provinces were covered for this study. The results are summarized as follows. A. Frequency of breaks down. 1) Power tiller was breaken down 9.05 times a year and it represents a break down every 39.1 hours of use. High frequency of breaks down was found from the fuel and ignition system. For only these system, the number of breaks down were 2.02 and it represents 23.3% among total breaks down. It was followed by attachments, cylinder system, and traction device. 2) For the power tiller which was more than six years old, breaks down accured 37.7 hours of use and every 38.6 hours for the power tiller which was purchased in less than 2 years. 3) For the kerosene engine power tiller, breaks down occured every 36.8 hours of use, which is a higher value compared with diesel engine power tiller which break down every 42.8 hours of use. The 8HP kerosene engine power tiller showed higher frequency of break down compared with any other horse power tiller. 4) In October, the lowest frequency of break down was found with the value of once for every 51.5 hours of use, and it was followed by the frequency of break down in June. The more hours of use, the less breaks down was found. E. Repair place 1) 45.3% among total breaks down of power tiller was repaired by the owner, and 54.7% was repaired at repair shop. More power tiller were repaired at repair shop than by owner of power tiller. 2) The older the power tiller is, the higher percentage of repairing at the repair shop was found compared with the repairing by the owner. 3) Higher percentage of repairing by the owner was found for the diesel engine power tiller compared with the kerosene engine power tiller. It was 10 HP power tiller for the kerosene power tiller and 8 HP for the diesel engine power tiller. 4) 66.7% among total breaks down of steering device was repaired by the owner. It was the highest value compared with the percentage of repairing of any other parts of power tiller. The lowest percentage of repairing by owner was found for the attachments to the power tiller with the value of 26.5%. C. Cause of break down 1) Among the total breaks down of power tiller, 57.2% is caused by the old parts of power tiller with the value of 5.18 times break down a year and 34.7% was caused by the poor maintenance and over loading. 2) For the power tiller which was purchased in less than two years, more breaks down were caused by poor maintenance in comparison to the old parts of power tiller. 3) For the both 8-10 HP kerosene and diesel engine power tiller, the aspects of breaks down was almost the same. But for the 5 HP power tiller, more breaks down was caused by over loading in comparison to the old parts of power tiller. 4) For the cylinder system and traction device, most of the breaks down was caused by the old parts and for the fuel and ignition system, breaks down was caused mainly by the poor maintenance. D. Repair Cost 1) For each power tiller, repair cost was 34,509 won a year and it was 97 won for one hoar operation. 2) Repair cost of kerosene engine power tiller was 40,697 won a year, and it use 28,320 won for a diesel engine power tiller. 3) Average repair cost for one hour operation of kerosene engine power tiller was 103 won, and 86 won for a diesel engine power tiller. No differences were found between the horse power of engines. 4) Annual repair cost of cylinder system was 13,036 won which is the highest one compared with the repair cost of any other parts 362 won a year was required to repair the steering device, and it was the least among repair cost of parts. 5) Average cost for repairing the power tiller one time was 3,183 won. It was 10,598 won for a cylinder system and 1,006 won for a steering device of power tiller. E. Time requirement for repairing by owner. 1) Average time requirements for repairing the break down of a power tiller by owner ..