The purpose of this study was to investigate the pulpal responses to adhesive resins as phosphoric ester system: "Clearfil F II" (Composite filling material), "Panavia EX" (Composite cementing Material) and "Silar" (Microfilled Compsoite resin) comparing with Zinc-Oxide-Eugenol cement. Total 70 cavities of the permanent healthy teeth from 5 dogs were prepared and placed with experimental resins and Zinc-Oxide-Eugenol cement as control. The dogs were sarificed at 5 intervals of 3 days, one, two, four, six weeks. The specimens were routinely prepared and stained by Hematoxylin-Eosin. Followings were the results obtained through microscopic examination. 1. In cases of Clearfil F II and Panavia EX without etching and lining, pulp response in the early stage showed more severe vascular congestion and hemorrhage than that of Zinc-Oxide-Engenol cement. 2. The pulp response of totally etched cases was similar to that of unetched cases in the groups of Clearfil F II and Panavia EX. 3. The cases of Clearfil F II and Panavia EX with enamel etching showed no significant histologic change compared to that of total cavity etching. 4. The Silar case with total etching showed retarded tendency of histologic recovery compared to Clearfil F II and Panavia EX group. 5. Generally, pulp responses of experimental groups were not severe and the six week case showed the evidence of a histologic recovery.