기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
IVF/ET Program에 있어서 과배란 유도 방법에 대한 비교 연구
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • IVF/ET Program에 있어서 과배란 유도 방법에 대한 비교 연구
  • A Comparative Study of Stimulation Protocols in IVF/ET Program
저자명
황인구,김선행,나중열,구병삼,Whang. In-Gu,Kim. Sun-Haeng,Rha. Jung-Yol,Ku. Pyong-Sahm
간행물명
大韓不妊學會雜誌
권/호정보
1989년|16권 2호|pp.211-220 (10 pages)
발행정보
대한생식의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The aim of this study was to compare the response and their outcome of superovulation induction protocol in IVF-ET program. One hundued seventy seven infertile women were stimulated by FSH/hMG(group I, N=128), clomiphene citrate/hMG(group II, N=51), and hMG(group III, N=18) for the purpose of ovulation induction. The results were as follows; 1. The mean ages of patients were $31.9{pm}3.8$ in group I, $30.6{pm}3.3$ in group II, and $29.3{pm}2.5$ in group III. 2. The day of hCG administration was $11.1{pm}1.8$ in group I, $12.1{pm}2.0$ in group II, and $13.7{pm}6.8$ in group III. The hCG administration day of group III was significantly delayed compared with that of group I (p<0.001). 3. The terminal E2 pattern in group II was different from those of group I and III, but there was no significant difference. 4. The mean numbers of mature eggs aspirated were $5.5{pm}3.8$ in group I, $5.0{pm}3.3$ in group II, and $5.6{pm}5.4$ in group III. There was no significant differences in the mean numbers of mature eggs retrieved among the three groups. 5. The fertilization rate of eggs was significantly higher in group II (67.9%) than that of group I (52.2%)(p<0.001). 6. The cleavage rate of group I (67.0%) was significantly lower than those of group II (93.2%) and group III (95.8%) (p<0.0001). 7. The mean numbers of embryos transfered were $3.3{pm}1.4$ in group I, $3.1{pm}1.3$ in group II, and $3.2{pm}1.6$ in group III and the ET rate was 69.0% in group I, 77.3% in group II, and 100% in group III. There was significant difference in ET rate between group I and group III (p<0.005). 8. The pregnancy rates per OPU cycle or ET cycle were not significantly different among the three groups, but delivered and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly different between group I (36.8%) and group II (p<88.8%) (p<0.05).