Electronic working length determination is based on the electrical impedence between the root canal and the periodontal ligament Different canal irrigants with different electric conductivity may effect on the accuracy of the electronic mechanism. 0.9% Saline, 2.5% NaOCl and 3% $H_2O_2$ were evaluated either in wet or in dry condition. The results were as follows. 1. The electrical resistance mearured by Impedence Meter (Model #253, portland, USA) were 1 $K{Omega}$ in 0.9% Saline, 0.1$K{Omega}$ in 2.5% NaOCl and 48 $K{Omega}$ in 3% $H_2O_2$. 2. Saline measured -0.57mm from the actual canal length and had significant difference. When dried with paper points, however, it measured -0.25mm demonstrating no statistical difference. 3. 2.5% NaOCl measured -4.07mm in wet and -2.26mm in dry condition and both showed significant difference from the actual canal length. 4. 3% $H_2O_2$ measured +0.02mm in wet and -0.09mm in dry canals and both appeared to be within acceptable range for the electronic working length mechanism.