기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
다단계(多段階) 분할최적화(分割最適化) 기법(技法)에 의(依)한 트러스 구조물(構造物)의 형상최적화(形狀最適化)에 관(關)한 연구(硏究)
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 다단계(多段階) 분할최적화(分割最適化) 기법(技法)에 의(依)한 트러스 구조물(構造物)의 형상최적화(形狀最適化)에 관(關)한 연구(硏究)
저자명
이규원,이재영,Lee. Gyu-Won,Lee. Jae-Young
간행물명
韓國鋼構造學會誌
권/호정보
1991년|3권 2호|pp.235-254 (20 pages)
발행정보
한국강구조학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Method of decomposition in optimization is divided into model coordination and goal coordination. But these two coordinations have problems because of their displacement constraint. This study made an attempt to solve these problems, an attempt which tried out optimization by sorting subsystem problem and system problem from optimum problem and even optimized geometric shape to reduce the weight of truss structure. This study took into consideration to solve system problem only displacement constraint which has a great effect on optimization, and critical constraint of subsystem problem linearized. And to solve subsystem problem it took into consideration allowable stress and buckling stress constraint, which has a little effect on optimum design for other parts of the structure, and constraint of the system problem linearized. Therefore this study which is connected subsystem problem with system problem and at the time governed optimum result of subsystem problem analyzed validity and convergence from four kinds of truss structures. The findings of study are as follows: 1. Dividing optimum problem into system problem and subsystem problem and optimizing these problems, this study reduced non-linear degree. Model and goal coordination hardly took into consideration displacement constraint, but the algorithm applied by this study could easily include displacement constraint into optimization problem. Objective function of system problem is different from that of subsystem problem so that parts of the structure which have different functions could be optimized. independently. 2. Optimum geometric shape is different for the same structure in accordance with constraint. 3. Comparing algorithm of this study with other algorithms, the result of objective function makes little difference and coordinate of joint also makes difference. But optimum geometric shape is similar each other. 4. Optimizing geometric shape, the weight of structure could be considerably reduced. Therefor shape optimization introduced by this study can be used for the economical design.