기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
만성통증환자의 통증연관 행위를 이용한 통증척도의 민감성 및 타당성 조사
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 만성통증환자의 통증연관 행위를 이용한 통증척도의 민감성 및 타당성 조사
  • Sensitivity and Validity Test of Pain Rating Scale Using Pain Behavior of Adult Patients with Chronic Pain
저자명
이은옥,이선옥,임난영,최순희,김달숙,김순자,한윤복,김주희,김광주
간행물명
대한간호학회지= Journal of Korean academy of nursing
권/호정보
1992년|22권 1호|pp.5-16 (12 pages)
발행정보
한국간호과학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The purposes of this study were : 1) to evaluate validity of a pain rating scale using the level of correlation between the Korean Pain Rating Scale(KPRS), Short -Form KPRS(SKPRS) and the Graphic Rating Scale(GRS). 2) to identify sensitivity of the scale using pain behavior of patients with chronic pain. Of the 2025 patients with chronic pain who visited the orthopedic and neurosurgical out - patients departments of 11 university hospitals in various districts of Korea, 520 subjects were selected through convenient sampling and responded to the questionnaires by mail. The results of the study can be summarized as follows : 1. The mean pain score measured by the KPRS was 444,85 : the mean sensory score was 209.47, the mean affective score, 147.63 and the mean miscellaneus score. 87.75. The mean pain score measured by the GRS was 20.11 : the mean sensory intensity score, 10.54. and the mean distress score, 9.57. 2. The average number of hours of rest during the day was 3.3, the average score of discomfort in carrying out ADL was 99, the average frequency of pain relieving practices was 3.0, the average number of pain sites was 3.6. 3. The most sensitive scale to differentiate each group was the GRS, the KPRS and SKPRS were less sensitive than the GRS. 4. The intercorrelation between the KPRS total score and the GRS score(.500) as well as that of the SKPRS score were highly correlated(.652), but intercorrelation between the SKPRS score and the GRS score(.172) was not high. Based on the above results, it was found that the SKPRS must be studied further to obtain validity.