기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
레진전장관의 금속면 처리방법 레진과 금속간 접착강도에 미치는 영향
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 레진전장관의 금속면 처리방법 레진과 금속간 접착강도에 미치는 영향
저자명
최낙준,방몽숙,Choi. Nak-Joon,Vang. Mong-Sook
간행물명
대한치과보철학회지
권/호정보
1994년|32권 4호|pp.471-483 (13 pages)
발행정보
대한치과보철학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effects of various surface treatments on veneering resin to metal bond for Ni-Cr alloy. The metal surfaces were treated as follows, Group 1 : Ground with carborudum point and followed by silicoating Group 2 : Sandblasted with $50{mu}m$ aluminum oxide and followed by silicoating Group 3. Sandblasted with $250{mu}m$ aluminum oxide and followed by silicoating Group 4 : Beaded with $200{mu}m$ retention structures and followed by silicoating Group 5 : Silicoated in as cast condition Group 6. Beaded with $200{mu}m$ retention structures only All specimens were veneered with resin. Each group was consisted of 20 specimens. 10 specimens were storaged in $37^{circ}C$ water for 3 days and the rest 10 specimens were thermocycled 1000 times at temperature of $5^{circ}C;to;55^{circ}C$. The effects of various surface treatments on the bond strength between resin and metal interface were studied by means of four-point flexure test. The specimens which bad been ground with carborundum point. sandblasted with $50{mu}m$ and $250{mu}m$ aluminum oxide. beaded with $200{mu}m$ retention structures and not been treated were observed with SEM. The following results were obtained 1. The bond strength of groups 2, 3, 4 and 6 were higher than the that of groups 1 and 5 (p<0.05) in the case of being storaged in $37^{circ}C$ water for 3 day and there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength among groups 2, 3, 4 and 6. and between groups 1 and 5 (p>0.05). 2. The bond strength of the case of being thermocycled decreased in the following orders : groups 2, group 4, group 3, group 6, group 1, group 5 and there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength among groups 2, 3 and 4, between groups 1 and 5 (p>0.05). 3. A statistical difference in bond strength of each group between storaged and being thermocycled was demonstrated for group 5 (p<0.05). 4. The treated surfaces of groups 2, 3 and 4 had more fine undercut than that of groups 1 and 5 with SEM.