기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
속립성폐결핵의 고해상 CT 소견
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 속립성폐결핵의 고해상 CT 소견
저자명
이승희
간행물명
대한방사선의학회지
권/호정보
1995년|33권 5호|pp.733-738 (6 pages)
발행정보
대한영상의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose : This study was performed to identify the characteristic findings of miliary pulmonary tuberculosison HRCT and to evaluate the usefulness of HRCT to compare with chest radiographs. Material and Methods : Highresolution CT, chest radiographs and medical records were retrospectively reviewed in 10 patients with miliarypulmonary tuberculosis. We analysed the size, distribution and margin of nodules, reticular or ground-glassdensity, parenchymal lesion, mediastinal lymphadenopathy and pleural effusion on HRCT which were compared withchest radiographic findings. Results : On HRCT, characteristic 1-2mm sized sharp or ill-defined nodular densitieswere randomly distributed throughout both lungs in all cases. In seven cases, the nodules were evenly scattered, but slightly more in upper lung zone in two cases, and in lower in one case. Only three cases revealed somewhatlarge and abundant nodules in posterior lung zone. There were findings of ill-defined margin of nodules in threecases, reticular densities in three cases and ground-glass opacity in two cases, all of which were observed within4 weeks after onset of symptom. In one case, HRCT scan revealed a micronodular pattern in the lung parenchyma, even though chest radiographs of 2 days before were not obviously abnormal. HRCT was better to evaluate the marginof nodule and distribution than chest radiographs in four cases. Focal parenchymal lesion(n=5), pleuraleffusion(n=4), mediastinal lymphadenopathy (n=6) and ARDS(n=1) were also associated. Conclusion : HRCT couldsuggest a more specific diagnosis of miliary pulmonary tuberculosis with the above characteristic findings inappropriate clinical setting and normal or interstitial pattern of chest radiographs.