기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
원격 진료 시스템 : 기흉 및 속립성 결핵의 검출능
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 원격 진료 시스템 : 기흉 및 속립성 결핵의 검출능
저자명
박노혁,배경수,신현웅,양근석,염헌규,류춘욱,김용길,서경진,강덕신
간행물명
대한방사선의학회지
권/호정보
1996년|35권 1호|pp.59-65 (7 pages)
발행정보
대한영상의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose : To evaluate the clinical utility of the teleradiology system using the information super highway communication network. Materials and Methods : Two radiologists selected 101 cases of pneumothorax and 20 cases of miliary tuberculosis. There were scanned and transmitted to our hospital at a speed of 640 Kbps and displayed on a video monitor with a resolution of 1280 pixels/line $ imes$ 1024 lines. Four radiologists divided into three groups :read the images group A read the images without image processing ; group B read the images with image processing, group C read the radiographic films on the view box. The authors compared sensitivity and specificity between the groups and checked their statistical significance using the Chi-square test. According to the location of the pleural line, we divided the pneumothorax into four types : continve on this live type 1, pleural line confined to the apex ; type 2, to the upper half ; type 3, to the lower half ; type 4, to the upper through lower half. We then compared sensitivity between the Three groups. Results : In the pneumothorax group, the average sensitivity of group A, B and C was 79%, 90% and 96%, and average specificity was 99%, 99% and 94%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in sensitivity between group A and B and between group B and C (p<0.017).There were no statistically significant difference in specificity between group A and B or between group B and C. In the miliary tuberculosis group, the average sensitivity of group A, B and C was 73%, 78% and 90%, and average specificity was 95%, 95% and 100%, respectively. With regard to sensitivity and specificity, there was no statistically significant difference between group A and B or between group B and C but there was a statistically significant difference between group A and C (p<0.017). According to the location of the pneumothorax, for all types, the sensitivity of group A was less than that of group B and group B was less than that of group C. Conclusion : All groups showed reduced observer performance in the detection of pneumothorax and military tuberculosis when reading a transmitted image on the monitor-workstation compared with reading conventional radiographs on the view box. To improve the clinical utility of the teleradiology system, a higher resolution workstation and adequate image processing are required.