- 기능적 자기공명영상을 이용한 단일과 복합 수지 운동의 비교 연구
- ㆍ 저자명
- 신병석,이호규,박성태,김동은,김재균,이명준,최충곤,서대철,임태환
- ㆍ 간행물명
- 대한방사선의학회지
- ㆍ 권/호정보
- 1998년|38권 6호|pp.965-970 (6 pages)
- ㆍ 발행정보
- 대한영상의학회
- ㆍ 파일정보
- 정기간행물| PDF텍스트
- ㆍ 주제분야
- 기타
Purpose : To assess, using functional MRI and by comparing activated motor sensory areas, the independence ofbrain activation during single and alternative multiple hand tasks. Materials and Methods : The subjects were sixhealthy volunteers. Using at 1.5T Siemens system and single shot FID-EPI sequencing(T2* weighted image;TR/TE0.96msec/61msec, flip angle 90。, matrix size 96X128, slice thickness/gap 5mm/0/8mm, FOV 200mm) and T1-weightedanatomic images, functional MRI was performed. The paradigm of motor tasks consisted of appositional fingermovements; the first involved the separate use of the right, left, and both hands, while an alternative taskinvolved the use of the right, left, and both hands in sequence. Using cross-correlation method(threshold:0.6) andfMRI analysis software (Stimulate 5.0), functional images were obtained. The activated area of brain cortex, thenumber of pixel, the aberage percentage change in signal intensity, and correlation of the time-signal intensitycurve in the activated motor area were analysed and compared between the two task groups. Statistical analysisinvolved the use of Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results : It was seen on fMRI that durina both single andalternative motor tasks, the same areas were consistently activated; in four volunteers, most activation occurredin the contralateral primary motor area. Between the two task methods, the average change in the number ofactivated pixels was 12.3$pm$5%, but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.1). Increased signalintensity in the alternative task group(7.48$pm$1.22%) was more statistically significant than in the single taskgroup(5.77$pm$0.9%)(P<.001). With regard to the time-intensity curve, there was significant correlation between thetwo groups(0.87$pm$0.07). Conclusion : Brain activation did not differ according to whether the motor task wassingle or alternative. We therefore suggest that during multiple stimuli, the relevant functional areas andneuronal column are activated independently.7???5???7???5???7???