기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
진행성위암의 자기공명영상 : T1 강조 FLASH, T2 강조 TSE 및 TrueFISP 영상간의 비교
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 진행성위암의 자기공명영상 : T1 강조 FLASH, T2 강조 TSE 및 TrueFISP 영상간의 비교
저자명
성창규
간행물명
대한방사선의학회지
권/호정보
1998년|39권 6호|pp.1149-1156 (8 pages)
발행정보
대한영상의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose : To compare the usefulness of three MR sequences for the depiction and staging of advanced gastriccancer (AGC). Materials and Methods : MR imaging was performed in 20 patients in whom AGC was proven by endoscopy.Axial scans with T1-weighted fast low-angle shot (FLASH), T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE), and true fast imagingwith steady state precession (TrueFISP) MR sequences were obtained. We measured the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) ofgastric cancer and signal difference-to-noise ratio (SD/N) between cancer and intraluminal fluid, cancer and thepancreas, and cancer and perigastric fat in each MR sequence. We also graded lesion conspicuity (poor, fair, orgood), and the degree of serosal invasion in each sequence. All results were correlated with histopathologicfindings. Results : TrueFISP was superior to FLASH or TSE in lesion conspicuity, and showed the highest value ofSD/N between cancer and intraluminal fluid. FLASH showed the highest value of SD/N between cancer and thepancreas, and cancer and perigastric fat. The accuracy of T-staging of AGC with MRI was 75% using FLASH, 70% usingTrueFISP, and 60% using TSE. FLASH sequence understaged in three cases(15%) and overstaged in two (10%). In Usingthe TrueFISP sequence, six cases(30%) were overstaged. Conclusion : TrueFISP showed the best lesion conspicuity,but tended to overstage the lesion. T1-weighted FLASH sequence showed the highest value of SD/N on theextraluminal side of the gastric wall, and was better than T2-weighted TSE or TrueFISP for T-staging of AGC.