기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Helicobacter pylori 감염 소화성궤양에서 Omeprazole중심 항생요법
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Helicobacter pylori 감염 소화성궤양에서 Omeprazole중심 항생요법
  • Omeprazole Based Antibiotic Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Peptic Ulcer Disease
저자명
강현주,강동훈,유종현,이숙향
간행물명
약학회지
권/호정보
2000년|44권 1호|pp.16-21 (6 pages)
발행정보
대한약학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Peptic ulcer is involved with Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic regimens are primary treatments. An optimal therapeutic regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori remains uncertain due to variable efficacy. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of omeprazole based antibiotic regimens in bacterial eradication, healing of peptic ulcer and to identify factors affecting efficacy. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled in the prospective, open-trial from November 1997 to Setember 1998. H. pylori infection was identified with endoscopy, H. pylori stain and rapid urease test. The first group (OAC7) received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 4 weeks which were the same schedule for all, amoxicillin and clarithromycin 500 mg three times daily for 1 week; the second group (OAC14), for 2 weeks on the same regimen as the first; and the last group (OACD) has taken bismuth in addition to the OAC7 regimen for 1 week. Eradication of H. pylori and healing of peptic ulcer were evaluated with endoscopy and tests for H. pylori before and after treatments. There were no significant differences in eradication rates; 77% in OAC7, 76% in OAC14, 81% in OACD (p=0.935) and healing rates; 82% in OAC7, 71% in OAC14, 95% in OACD (p=0.179), respectively. Compliance had an relationship with eradication rates significantly among regimens (p=0.049). Twenty three cases (29%) complained of the minor side effects. In conclusion, OAC7 was better in convenience of dosing schedule and showed fewer side effects with shorter duration and lower cost while There were no significant differences in efficacy among regimens.