저자는 1999년 6월부터 2000년 4월까지 경북대학교병원 구강악안면외과에서 하악골 후퇴를 위해 SSRO 혹은 LeFort I 골 절단술을 동반한 SSRO를 시행받은 환자 42명을 대상으로 술전, 술후 1개월, 술후 6개월에 각각 MKG를 이용하여 하악운동량 및 양상을 조사하고 이를 몇 가지 요소에 따라 군으로 나누어 계측치를 측정, 연구한 바 아래와 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 남녀 성별에 따른 두 군 사이에서, 좌측운동량의 변화 및 최대 개구속도의 변화량은 유의한 차이가 있었으며(p<0.05), 그 외의 항목은 차이가 없었다. 2. SSRO만을 시행 받거나 혹은 LeFort I을 동반하여 SSRO를 시행받을 경우, 수술방법에 따른 하악운동량의 변화는 유의성이 없었다.(p>0.05) 3. 하악골이동량에 따른 세 군에서 각 군사이의 하악운동량의 변화는 좌측 측방운동량에서는 $6{sim}10mm$의 이동군이 가장 우수하였으며(p<0.05), 그 외의 항목은 통계적 유의성이 없었다. 4. 하악골의 개폐구 양상은 전두면 상에서 술전이 복잡편향형, 단순편향형, 복잡편위형, 단순편위형, 직선형 순이었고 술후 1개월에서는 단순편향형, 단순편위형, 복잡편위형, 직선형, 복잡편향형 순이며, 술후 6개월에서는 술전과 같은 순서였다. 또한 시상면상에서는 술전에 비일치형이, 술후 1개월에서는 일치형이 술후 6개월에서는 다시 비일치형이 우세하였다. 5. 술전 관절증의 증상유무에 따른 두 군사이의 하악운동량의 변화에는 통계적 유의성이 없었다(p>0.05). 6. 과두재위치장치를 적용한 군과 적용하지 않은 군에서, 두 군사이의 하악운동량의 변화에는 유의성이 없었다(p>0.05). 7. 술전 관절증이 있었던 환자중 술후 관절증의 완화가 나타난 경우가 63% 였으며, 과두재위치장치를 적용하지 않은 군에서 술후 관절증의 완화가 더 유의성있게 나타났다(p<0.05).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship of the factors which could be influenced by orthognathic surgery especillay SSRO. We measured the amounts of the maximum opening, lateral movements, maximum velocity and pattern of mandibular path during the opening and closing of mandible at the following times ; preoperative, 1 month after operation, 6 months after operation respectively using MKG. And the results were compared according to the categorized subgroups. Following results were obtained : 1. The change of the amounts of mandibular lateral movement and maximum opening velocity were statistically different between male and female (p<0.05), but the others were not. 2. According to the method of operation, there was no difference in the change of the mandibular movements between the group of SSRO and SSRO plus LeFort I osteotomy (p>0.05). 3. According to the amounts of mandibular movement, the recovery of left lateral movement of the group of $6{sim}10mm$ was better than the other groups (p<0.05). 4. In the frontal pattern of the opening and closing of the mandible, the complex deflected type (F5), simple deflected type (F4), complex deviated type (F3), simple deviated type (F2), straight type (F1) were obtained in order at the time of preoperative, simple deflected type, simple deviated type, complex deviated type, straight type, complex deflected type in order at the time of 1 month after surgery, and the result at the time of 6 months after surgery was the same with that of the time of preoperative. In the sagittal pattern, non-coincident type (S2) was predominant at the time of preoperative, and coincident type (S1) was predominant at the time of 1 month after surgery. After 6 months, the result was also the same with that of the preoperative in sagittal pattern. 5. There was not a statistical difference in the change of the mandibular movement between group of presence of the preoperative TMJ symptoms and non-presence group (p>0.05). 6. There was not a statistical difference in the change of the mandibular movement between repositioning device applied group and non-applied group (p>0.05). 7. Sixty three percents of the patients who had preoperative TMJ symptoms were improved after surgery and preoperative TMJ symptoms were more improved after operation in the repositioning device non-applied group statistically (p<0.05).
