기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
간호결과분류체계(Nursing Outcomes Classifications)의 한글 명명화에 대한 타당성 연구;260개 간호결과명을 중심으로
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 간호결과분류체계(Nursing Outcomes Classifications)의 한글 명명화에 대한 타당성 연구;260개 간호결과명을 중심으로
  • Validation of Korean Nomenclature of NOC;Focused on 260 Outcomes
저자명
유형숙,장인순,전미순,김희걸,남혜경,박연숙,김옥현,박혜자,황윤영,이정희,이미자,최은희,이인순,이순희,염영희,지성애,Yoo. Hyung-Sook,Jang. In-Sun,Jeon. Mi-Soon,Kim. Hee-Girl,Nam. Hy
간행물명
간호행정학회지
권/호정보
2002년|8권 2호|pp.221-238 (18 pages)
발행정보
간호행정학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test the validity of the standardized Korean nomenclature of 260 Nursing Outcomes Classification(NOC) developed by Johnson and Mass at University of Iowa in 2000. Method: The four phases of the study were: (1) translation of the NOC into Korean by the Research Team, (2) nine nursing professors and nurses with various clinical backgrounds reviewed each nomenclature taking into consideration of definitions and outcome indicators. The modified Delphi method was used to determine the most appropriate nomenclature for each term, (3) 307 Clinical expert nurses more than three years field experiences were given a questionnaire to rate each Korean nomenclature using a 5 point Likert scale ranging from very inappropriate to very appropriate, and (4) final accordance of Korean Nomenclature. Result: The team determined that 260 Korean nomenclature was appropriately named. because the mean validity score of 260 outcomes was 3.90 and each of 260 Korean nomenclature had a score more than 3.00. Conclusion: Korean nomenclature of NOC can be used as a standardized language of nursing result in a computerized nursing information system.