기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
IN VITRO STUDY OF THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF CEMENT-RETAINED SINGLE IMPLANT PROSTHESIS BY THE VARIOUS PROVISIONAL LUTING CEMENTS AND THE SURFACE TREATMENT OF ABUTMENTS
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • IN VITRO STUDY OF THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF CEMENT-RETAINED SINGLE IMPLANT PROSTHESIS BY THE VARIOUS PROVISIONAL LUTING CEMENTS AND THE SURFACE TREATMENT OF ABUTMENTS
  • IN VITRO STUDY OF THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF CEMENT-RETAINED SINGLE IMPLANT PROSTHESIS BY THE VARIOUS PROVISIONAL LUTING CEMENTS AND THE SURFACE TREATMENT OF ABUTMENTS
저자명
Lee. Hwa-Yeon,Lee. Ho-Sang
간행물명
대한치과보철학회지
권/호정보
2002년|40권 3호|pp.296-305 (10 pages)
발행정보
대한치과보철학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The main disadvantage of cement-retained implant restorations is their difficulty in retrievability. Advocates of cemented implant restorations frequently state that retrievability of the restoration can be maintained if a provisional cement is used. The purpose of this study was to find the optimal properties of provisional luting cements and the surface treatment of abutments in single implant abutment system. 30 prefabricated implant abutments, height 8mm, diameter 6mm, 3-degree taper per side, with light chamfer margins were obtained. Three commercially available provisional luting agents which were all zinc oxide eugenol type ; Cavitec, TempBond and TempBond NE were evaluated. No cement served as the control. TempBond along with vaseline, a kind of petrolatum (2:1 ratio) was also evaluated. Ten out of thirty abutments were randomly selected and abutment surfaces were sandblasted with $50{mu}m$ aluminum oxide. Another ten abutments were sandblasted with $250{mu}m$ aluminum oxide. A vertical groove, 1 mm deep and 5mm long was cut in each twenty abutments. Ten of them were sandblasted with $50{mu}m$ aluminum oxide. The full coverage casting crowns were cemented to the abutments with the designated provisional luting agent. Specimens were stored in distilled water at $37^{circ}C$ for 24 hours. Each specimen was attached to a universal testing machine. A crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min was used to apply a tensile force to each specimen. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. Tensile bond strength of provisional luting cements in no surface treatment decreased with the sequence of TempBond NE, TempBond, Cavitec, TempBond with vaseline, no cement. 2. Tensile bond strength more increased by surface treatment. Sandblasting with $250{mu}m$ aluminum oxide exhibited the highest tensile bond strength in the abutment cemented with TempBond NE and sandblasting with $50{mu}m$ aluminum oxide exhibited the highest tensile bond strength in cemented with TempBond. 3. In the aspect of a groove formation, tensile bond strength significantly increased in TempBond with vaseline only and the others had no significant effect on tensile bond strength.