Objectives & methods : This study aimed to investigate and compare the traditional acupuncture treatment and Sa-am acupuncture treatment of stroke. We investigated ${ll}$Sa-am chimgujeongjeon(舍岩鍼灸正傳)${gg}$ for Sa-am acupuncture treatment, and ${ll}$Dongeuibogam(東醫寶鑑)${gg}$ and ${ll}$Chimgudaesung (鍼灸大成)${gg}$ for traditional acupuncture treatment. Results & Conclusion : 1. In the traditional acupuncture treatment, acupoints on CV, GV, GB, LI, ST meridians to remove pathogens such as fire, damp, phlegm, blood stagnation and Ashi points (nearby points) are often used rather than acupoints according to the diagnosis of excess & deficiency in organs and meridians. 2. In ${ll}$Sa-am chimgujungjeon(舍岩鍼灸正傳)${gg}$, symptoms of stroke are classified into 21 and each symptoms are analyzed according to the diagnosis of excess & deficiency of organs and meridians, consequently treated using tonification & sedation of corresponding meridians. 3. For the treatment of stroke in ${ll}$Sa-am chimgujungjeon(舍岩鍼灸正傳)${gg}$, tonification & sedation of the acupoints on related meridian is often omitted, using only the acupoints on targeted meridian. 4. In ${ll}$Sa-am chimgujungjeon(舍岩鍼灸正傳)${gg}$, empirical points are preferably used for the treatment of stroke.