기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
하악피개의치에서 임플랜트의 식립각도에 따른 칸틸레버 길이의 감소효과가 응력분포 양상에 미치는 영향 -삼차원 유한요소법을 이용한 분석-
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 하악피개의치에서 임플랜트의 식립각도에 따른 칸틸레버 길이의 감소효과가 응력분포 양상에 미치는 영향 -삼차원 유한요소법을 이용한 분석-
  • FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF CANTILEVER AND IMPLANT ORIENTATION ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN A MANDIBULAR IMPLANT-SUPPORTED BAR OVERDENTURE
저자명
박준수,이성복,권긍록,우이형,Park. Jun-Soo,Lee. Sung-Bok,Kwon. Kung-Rock,Woo. Yi-Hyung
간행물명
대한치과보철학회지
권/호정보
2007년|45권 4호|pp.444-456 (13 pages)
발행정보
대한치과보철학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Statement of problem: Implant inclination and cantilever loading increse loads distributed to implants, potentially causing biomechanical complications. Controversy exists regarding the effect of the intentionally distal-inclined implant for the reduction of the cantilever length. Purpose: This study investigated the stress distribution at the bone/implant interface and prostheses with 3D finite element stress analysis by using four different cantilever lengths and implant inclinations in a mandibular implant-supported bar overdenture. Material and methods: Four 3-D finite element models were created in which 4 implants were placed in the interforaminal area and had four different cantilver lengths(10, 6.9, 4 and 1.5mm) and distal implant inclinations$(0^{circ},;15^{circ},;30^{circ};and;45^{circ})$ respectively. Vortical forces of 120N and oblique forces of 45N were applied to the molar area. Stress distribution in the bone around the implant was analysed under different distal implant inclinations. Results: Analysis of the von Mises stresses for the bone/implant interfaces and prostheses revealed that the maximum stresses occurred at the most distal bone/implant interface and the joint of bar and abutment, located on the loaded side and significantly incresed with the implant inclinations, especially over $45^{circ}$. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was suggested that too much distal inclination over 45 degrees can put the implant at risk of overload and within the dimension of the constant sum of a anterior-posterior spread and cantilever length, a distal implant inclination compared to cantilever length had the much larger effect on the stress distribution at the bone/implant interface.