기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
디지털 공제술을 이용한 $Br{aa}nemark$ 임플란트 주위 골조직 분석
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 디지털 공제술을 이용한 $Br{aa}nemark$ 임플란트 주위 골조직 분석
저자명
소성수,노현수,김창성,최성호,채중규,김종관,조규성,So. Sung-Soo,Noh. Hyuen-Soo,Kim. Chang-Sung,Choi. Seong-Ho,Chae. Jung-Kiu,Kim. Chong-Kwan,Cho. Kyoo-
간행물명
대한치주과학회지
권/호정보
2007년|37권 1호|pp.137-150 (14 pages)
발행정보
대한치주과학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

CADIA(Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis) method is used to analyze bone density changes around the implants. The usefullness and reproducibility of the method was assessed. We tried to find out if there is any possibility to quantitiate and qualitify peri-implant bone density change as time passes. And we concluded that this newly developed linear analysis is efficient for analyzing peri-implant bone density change non-Invasively. In this study, 2152 machined $Br{aa}nemark$ fixtures installed from 1994 to 2002 in the department of Periodontics, Dental hospital of College of Dentistry, Yonsei University were included. Of these fixtures 22 radiographically analyzable failed fixtures were used as experimental group, and 22 successful implants placed in the same patient were used as control group. 1. 57 out of 1635 machined $Br{aa}nemark$ standard and Mk II implants system failed, the survival rate was 96.5%. And 11 out of 517 machined $Br{aa}nemark$ Mk III and Mk IV implants system failed, the survival rate was 97.9%. Total survival rate was 96.8%. 2. 22 failed implants were used for the analysis, 10 of which failed before prosthetic treatment due to infection and overheating. 12 failed due to overload after prosthetic treatment, 63.6% of which failed during the early phase of functional loading, i, e. before 1 year of loading. 3. Bone density change values around coronal region of the failed implants were $-6.54{pm}6.35$, middle region were $-3.53{pm}5.78$, apical region were $-0.75{pm}10.33$, resulting in average of $-3.71{pm}8.03$. 4. Bone density change values around coronal region of the successful implants were $4.25{pm}4.66$, middle region were $6.33{pm}5.02$, apical region were $9.89{pm}4.67$, resulting in average of $6.27{pm}5.29$. 5. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups (p<0.01). In conclusion, the linear analysis method using computer-assisted densitometric image analysis could be a useful method for the analysis of implants, and could be used for future implant researchs.