기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
The Processing Optimization of Caviar Analogs Encapsulated by Calcium-Alginate Gel Membranes
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • The Processing Optimization of Caviar Analogs Encapsulated by Calcium-Alginate Gel Membranes
  • The Processing Optimization of Caviar Analogs Encapsulated by Calcium-Alginate Gel Membranes
저자명
Ji. Cheong-Il,Cho. Sueng-Mock,Gu. Yeun-Suk,Kim. Seon-Bong
간행물명
Food science and biotechnology
권/호정보
2007년|16권 4호|pp.557-564 (8 pages)
발행정보
한국식품과학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

We prepared caviar analogs encapsulated by calcium-alginate gel membranes as a means to replace higher priced natural caviars. Processing the caviar analogs (beluga type) was optimized by response surface methodology with central composite design. Concentrations of sodium alginate ($X_1$) and $CaCl_2;(X_2)$ were chosen as the independent variables. In order to compare characteristics of the caviar analogs with the natural caviar, sphericity ($Y_1$), diameter ($Y_2$), membrane thickness ($Y_3$), rupture strength ($Y_4$), rupturing deformation ($Y_5$), and sensory score ($Y_6$) were used as the dependent variables. The sphericity of the caviar analogs showed a similar value to that of natural caviar (over 94%) in the range of independent variables. Generally, the $CaCl_2$ concentration ($X_2$) affected all dependent variables to a greater extent than the sodium alginate concentration ($X_l$), For the multiple response optimization of the 5 dependent variables ($Y_1,;Y_2,;Y_4,;Y_5$, and $Y_6$), the desirability function was defined as the following conditions: target values ($Y_1;=;100%,;Y_2;=;3.0;mm,;Y_4;=;1,470;g,;Y_5;=;1.1;mm,;and;Y_6;=;10;points$). Membrane thickness ($Y_3$) was eliminated from the dependent variables for multiple response optimization because it could not be measured with an image analyzer. The values of the independent variables as evaluated by multiple response optimization were $X_1;=;-0.093$ (78%) and $X_2;=;-0.322$ (1.07%), respectively.