기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
치조골 결손부 치료시 calcium carbonate와 calcium sulfate 혼합물의 임상적 효과
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 치조골 결손부 치료시 calcium carbonate와 calcium sulfate 혼합물의 임상적 효과
저자명
이승범,채경준,정의원,김창성,최성호,조규성,김종관,채중규,Lee. Seung-Bum,Chae. Gyung-Jun,Jung. Ui-Won,Kim. Chang-Sung,Choi. Seong-Ho,Cho. Kyoo-Sung,Kim. C
간행물명
대한치주과학회지
권/호정보
2008년|38권 2호|pp.237-246 (10 pages)
발행정보
대한치주과학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose: If bone grafts and guided tissue regeneration are effective individually in treating osseous defects, then the questionis, what would happen when they are combined. Bone grafts using Calcium Carbonate(Biocoral) and Guided Tissue Regeneration using Calcium Sulfate(CALMATRIX) will maximize their advantages and show the best clinical results in intrabony defects. This study was to compare the effects of a combination of CS and CC with control treated only with modified widman flap in a periodontal repair of intrabony defects. Materials and Methods: 30 patients with chronic periodontitis were used in this study. 10 patients were treated with a combination of CS and CC as the experimental group II and another 10 patients were treated with CC as the experimental group I, and the remaining 10 patients, the control group were treated only with modified widman flap. Clinical parameters including probing depth, gingival recession, bone probing depth and loss of attachment were recorded 6 months later. Results: The probing depth changes were $3.30{pm}1.34;mm$ in the control group, $4.2{pm}1.55;mm$ in the experimental group I(CC) and $5.00{pm}1.33;mm$ in the experimental group II(CS+CC). They all showed a significant decrease 6 months after surgery(p<0.01). There was a significant difference(p<0.05) between the control and experimental group. However there were no significant difference(p<0.05) between the experimental group I and II. The gingival recession changes w $-1.30{pm}1.25;mm$ in the control group, This is a significant difference(p<0.01). However, there was a $-0.50{pm}0.53;mm$ change in the experimental group I(CC) and $-0.60{pm}0.97;mm$ in the experimental group II(CS+CC). In addition, in terms of gingival recession, there was a no significance difference(p<0.05) among the groups. The clinical attachment level changes were $2.00{pm}1.33;mm$ in the control group, $3.60{pm}1.58;mm$ in the experimental group I(CC) and $4.40{pm}1.17;mm$ in the experimental group II(CS+CC). They all showed a significant decrease 6 months after surgery(p<0.01). There was a significant difference(p<0.05) between the control and experimental group. However there was a no significance difference(p<0.05) between the experimental group I and II. The bone probing depth changes were $0.60{pm}0.52;mm$ in the control group, $3.20{pm}1.48;mm$ in the experimental group I(CC) and $4.60{pm}1.43;mm$ in the experimental group II(CS+CC). All of them showed a significant decrease 6 months after surgery(p<0.01), there was a significance difference(p<0.05) among the groups. Conclusion: Treatment using a combination of CS and CC have a potential to improve periodontal parameters in intrabony defects and More efficient clinical results can be expected in intrabony defects less than 2 walls grafted with CS and CC.