기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
돈황본(敦煌本) "상한론(傷寒論)"에 관한 연구(硏究)
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 돈황본(敦煌本) "상한론(傷寒論)"에 관한 연구(硏究)
저자명
박시덕,신상우,박종현,Park. Si-Deok,Shin. Sang-Woo,Park. Jong-Hyun
간행물명
大韓韓醫學原典學會誌
권/호정보
2008년|21권 1호|pp.27-42 (16 pages)
발행정보
대한한의학원전학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

It is generally called that the Donhwang Manuscript[敦煌本] "Sanghallon(傷寒論)" is all the series of documents relating to the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)", included in one of the testaments, which was, in 1900, originally found in the Janggyeong hole[藏經洞], Makgo cave[莫高庸], Donhwang(敦煌), Gamsuk province[甘肅省]. The consecutive numbers of the Manuscript are S 202 and P 3287, the former is called the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)" A-Manuscript[甲本] and the latter consists of the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)" B-Manuscript[乙本] and the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)" C-Manuscript[丙本]. The Donhwang Manuscript is a type of a hurt book, but not a complete form of a book. As the research conducted, it has been proven that the Donhwang Manuscript "Sanghallon(傷寒論)" has the academic values as mentioned below. First, it is highly valuable to inter-related study and revise the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)". Second, it is one of circumstantial evidences to have various kinds of versions of the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)". Third, its findings somehow wipes out arguments concerning with identifying authors of the "Sanghallon(傷寒論) Sanghanrye(傷寒例)" and the "Sanghallon(傷寒論) Byeonmaekbeop(辦脈法)". Fourth, it has turned out that the existing "Geumgweokhamgyeong" is not a forgery, but one of imparted versions of the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)" In conclusion, it could be acknowledged that the discovery of the Donhwang Manuscript "Sanghallon(傷寒論)" enables to arrange and revise the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)", and it has provided researchers with critical evidences about ascertaining many kinds of different versions of the "Sanghallon(傷寒論)". Moreover, we can also find the great contribution of this findings which could clarify various non-proven arguments within many experts and researchers.