기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution in Composite Resin Brackets with Metal Slot of Permanent Maxillary Central Incisor Using the Finite Element Method: A Pilot Study
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution in Composite Resin Brackets with Metal Slot of Permanent Maxillary Central Incisor Using the Finite Element Method: A Pilot Study
  • Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution in Composite Resin Brackets with Metal Slot of Permanent Maxillary Central Incisor Using the Finite Element Method: A Pilot Study
저자명
Im. Jae-Jung,Song. Jae-Joon,Kim. Nan-Hee,Heo. Jin-Young,Jung. Gyu-Un,Hwang. Kyung-Gyun,Park. Chang-Joo
간행물명
Journal of Korean dental science
권/호정보
2011년|4권 2호|pp.46-51 (6 pages)
발행정보
대한치의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose: For aesthetic reasons, composite resin brackets are widely used. However, related studies are rare. This pilot study sought to compare the stress distributions in two commercially available composite resin brackets with metal slot. Materials and Methods: Two commercially available resin brackets -- full-metal slot resin bracket (fSRB) and partial-metal slot resin bracket (pSRB) with straight wire appliance dimension of $0.022{ imes}0.028$ in -- were selected. In each bracket, 3-dimensional finite element models were constructed, and stress level was evaluated using finite element analysis. By loading the tipping force and torsion moment, which are similar to those applied by the stainless steel rectangular wire ($0.019{ imes}0.025$ -in), stress distributions were calculated, and von Mises stress values were obtained. Results: In pSRB and fSRB, the stress value of the torque moment was much higher than that of the tipping force. The pSRB showed higher stress value than fSRB in both tipping force and torque moment because of the difference in size and configuration of the metal frame inserted into the slot. More stress was also found to be concentrated on the slot area than the wing area in fSRB. Conclusion: The slot form of fSRB was found to be more resistant to the stress of tipping and torque than the slot form of pSRB. In addition, the slot areas -- rather than the wing areas -- of the bracket showed breakage susceptibility. Therefore, resistance to the torque moment on the slot area should be considered in bracket design.