기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
무지외반증에서 근위 갈매기형 절골술 후 고정 방법에 따른 차이: K-강선, 유관나사, 금속판
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 무지외반증에서 근위 갈매기형 절골술 후 고정 방법에 따른 차이: K-강선, 유관나사, 금속판
저자명
김택선,김학준,박영환,임형태,Kim. Taik-Seon,Kim. Hak-Jun,Park. Young-Hwan,Lim. Hyung-Tae
간행물명
대한족부족관절학회지
권/호정보
2011년|15권 2호|pp.62-67 (6 pages)
발행정보
대한족부족관절학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose: The authors evaluated the differences between K-wires and Cannulated screw, plate for fixing the proximal metatarsal chevron osteotomy of moderate and severe hallux valgus. Materials and Methods: There were 62 patients (79 feetz) who were moderate and severe degree hallux valgus according to the classification of Mann. They all got the proximal chevron osteotomy when correcting the deformity. We divided the patients into 4 groups, Two K-wire fixed group as A, one cannulated screw fixed group as B. Two cannulated screw fixed group as C, Plate fixed group as D, Group A were patients (26 feet) and Group B were patients z(9 feet), Group C were patients (31 feet) and Group D were patients (13 feet). Preoperative, postoperative and follow-up hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were measured for each patient. ANOVA test and Student t-test were done for statistical analysis. Results: Mean follow up period was 43.8 months (range: 12~82 months). Preoperative mean IMA was $16.4{pm}3.5$, $17.7{pm}11.3$, $17.3{pm}5.9$ and $16.6{pm}2.3$ degrees in respectively group A, B, C, D. Immediate postoperative mean IMA was $5.6{pm}3.4$, $7.3{pm}4.4$, $7.6{pm}4.4$ and $6.7{pm}2.8$ degrees in respectively group A, B, C, D. The final mean IMA was $8.9{pm}4.5$, $15.2{pm}7.5$, $10.3{pm}4.4$ and D $7.7{pm}3.5$ degrees in respectively group A, B, C, D. There were significant statistical increase in final mean IMA of group B and C (p<0.05). Conclusion: The IMA was significantly increased in the group which used one or two cannulated screw for fixation on follow up, therefore more caution should be needed when using one or two cannulated screw fixation technique after proximal chevron osteotomy.