기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Role of $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT, $^{123}I$-MIBG SPECT, and CT in Restaging Patients Affected by Malignant Pheochromocytoma
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Role of $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT, $^{123}I$-MIBG SPECT, and CT in Restaging Patients Affected by Malignant Pheochromocytoma
  • Role of $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT, $^{123}I$-MIBG SPECT, and CT in Restaging Patients Affected by Malignant Pheochromocytoma
저자명
Cantalamessa. Antonio,Caobelli. Federico,Paghera. Barbara,Caobelli. Antonio,Vavassori. Francesca
간행물명
Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : NMMI
권/호정보
2011년|45권 2호|pp.125-131 (7 pages)
발행정보
대한핵의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose Pheochromocytoma (PH) is a rare catecholaminesecreting tumor that arises from chromaffin tissue within the adrenal medulla and extra-adrenal sites; commonly it is sporadic, and malignant PH accounts for about 10% of all cases. Several imaging modalities have been used for the diagnosis and staging of this tumor: functional imaging using radio-labelled metaiodobenzylguanidine and, more recently, $^{18}F$-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ($^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT), which offers substantial sensitivity and specificity to correctly detect metastatic PH and helps to identify patients suitable for treatment with radiopharmaceuticals. The aim of our study was to compare CT, $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT, and $^{123}I$-metaiodobenzylguanidine single photon emission tomography ($^{123}I$-MIBG SPECT) as feasible methods to restage patients diagnosed histologically with PH. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 38 patients (27 females and 11 males; mean age: $44{pm}15$ years) with malignant PH documented histologically after surgical intervention. These patients underwent CT, $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT, and $^{123}I$-MIBG SPECT. Results $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT showed positive results for neoplastic tissue in 33/38 patients (86.8%) and negative in 5/38 (13.2%), in concordance with CT alone. $^{123}I$-MIBG SPECT was positive in 30/38 patients (78,9%) and negative in 8/38 (21.1%). No differences in lesion numbers were found between $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT and CT, whereas a difference could be demonstrated between $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT and $^{123}I$-MIBG SPECT. Conclusion $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT could more accurately restage patients with PH than CT and $^{123}I$-MIBG SPECT, also in the absence of a staging study.