기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Diagnostic Performance of Three-Phase Bone Scan for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 with Optimally Modified Image Criteria
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Diagnostic Performance of Three-Phase Bone Scan for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 with Optimally Modified Image Criteria
  • Diagnostic Performance of Three-Phase Bone Scan for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 with Optimally Modified Image Criteria
저자명
Kwon. Hyun-Woo,Paeng. Jin-Chul,Nahm. Francis Sahn-Gun,Kim. Seog-Gyun,Zehra. Tanzeel,Oh. So-Won,Lee. Hyo-Sang,Kang. Keon-Wook,Chu
간행물명
Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : NMMI
권/호정보
2011년|45권 4호|pp.261-267 (7 pages)
발행정보
대한핵의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose Although the three-phase bone scan (TBPS) is one of the widely used imaging studies for diagnosing complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-1), there is some controversy regarding the TPBS image criteria for CRPS-1. In this study, we modified the image criteria using image pattern and quantitative analysis in the patients diagnosed using the most recent consensus clinical diagnostic criteria. Materials and Methods The study included 140 patients with suspected CRPS-1 (CRPS-1, n=79; non-CRPS, n=61; mean age $39{pm}15$ years) who underwent TPBS. The clinical diagnostic criteria for CRPS-1 revised by the Budapest consensus group were used for confirmative diagnosis. Patients were classified according to flow/pool and delayed uptake (DU) image patterns, and the time interval between the initiating event and TPBS ($TI_{event-scan}$). Quantitative analysis for lesion-to-contralateral ratio (LCR) was performed. Modified TPBS image criteria were created and evaluated for optimal diagnostic performance. Results Both increased and decreased periarticular DU were significant image findings for CRPS-1 (CRPS-1 positive-rate=73% in the increased DU group, 75% in the decreased DU group). The $TI_{event-scan}$ did not differ significantly between the different image pattern groups. Quantitative analysis revealed an LCR of 1.43 was the optimal cutoff value for CRPS-1 and diagnostic performance was significantly improved in the increased DU group (area under the curve=0.732). Given the modified image criteria, the sensitivity and specificity of TPBS for diagnosing CRPS-1 were 80% and 72%, respectively. Conclusions Optimally modified TPBS image criteria for CRPS-1 were suggested using image pattern and quantitative analysis. With the criteria, TPBS is an effective imaging study for CRPS-1 even with the most recent consensus clinical diagnostic criteria.