본 연구에서는 의사결정자의 대립관계가 있는 항만개발 문제에 대한 우선순위 평가와 보상관계를 분석하였다. 이를 위해 먼저 항만개발에 대한 관련문헌을 분석하여 평가요소를 추출하였고, FSM법을 이용하여 평가요소를 구조화하고, 구조화 분석을 통해 평가항목을 선정하였다. 두 번째, 항만개발 평가 주체를 지역주민, 이용자, 지자체로 선정하고 AHP법을 이용하여 종합 평가치를 산출하였다. 세 번째 JMPR법을 이용하여 평가주체간 제휴를 구성하였을때 종합 평가결과와 대체안 선정에 따른 불만량을 최소로 하여 평가하는 방법을 제시하였다. 또한 대체안 선정에 따른 보상문제를 정량화하고 보상관계를 분석하였다. 그 결과 대상 항만중 부산항 개발이 가장 우선되어야 하며, 항만이용자는 환경에 대한 인식의 개선과, 지자체에서는 환경 친화적인 항만개발을 위한 환경 인센티브 정책을 추진해야 할 것이다.
In this study, the priority was assessed and the compensation relationships were analyzed with regard to the issue of port development with conflicts among decision makers. First, the assessment factors were selected by the relevant literatures on port development, and fuzzy structure modeling was used to select assessment factors via structuralization analysis. Second, the local residents, port users, and local government were chosen as the main port-development related entities, and the analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the total assessment value. Third, the justice based on majority power rule method was used as an assessment method that would minimize the amount of complaints according to the total assessment results and the alternative selection when a partnership was formed among the assessment entities. Moreover, the compensation issue according to the alternative selection was quantified, and the compensation relationships were analyzed. As a result, it was found that port development in Busan must be the top priority in terms of port development in South Korea, that awareness of environmental issues must be promoted among the port users, and that the local governments must promote environmental incentive policies for Environment-friendly port development.
