기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using a computer-aided diagnosis system
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using a computer-aided diagnosis system
  • Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using a computer-aided diagnosis system
저자명
Sutthiprapaporn. Pipop,Tanimoto. Keiji,Nakamoto. Takashi,Kongsomboon. Supaporn,Limmonthol. Saowaluck,Pisek. Poonsak,Keinprasit.
간행물명
Imaging science in dentistry
권/호정보
2012년|42권 4호|pp.225-229 (5 pages)
발행정보
대한구강악안면방사선학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the trabecular bone changes after alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients using a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. Materials and Methods: The occlusal radiographs taken from 50 UCLP patients were surveyed retrospectively. The images were categorized as: 50 images in group 0 (before bone grafting), 33 images in group 1 (one month after bone grafting), 24 images in group 2 (2-4 months after bone grafting), 15 images in group 3 (5-7 months after bone grafting), and 21 images in group 4 (8 or more months after bone grafting). Each image was grouped as either "non-cleft side" or "cleft side". The CAD system was used five times for each side to calculate the pixel area based on the mathematical morphology. Significant differences were found using a Wilcoxon signed ranks test or paired samples t test. Results: The pixel area showed a significant difference between the "non-cleft side" and "cleft side" in group 0 ($404.27{pm}103.72/117.73{pm}92.25$; p=0.00), group 1 ($434.29{pm}86.70/388.31{pm}109.51$; p=0.01), and group 4 ($430.98{pm}98.11/366.71{pm}154.59$; p=0.02). No significant differences were found in group 2 ($423.57{pm}98.12/383.47{pm}135.88$; p=0.06) or group 3 ($433.02{pm}116.07/384.16{pm}146.55$; p=0.19). Conclusion: Based on the design of this study, alveolar bone grafting was similar to normal bone within 2-7 months postoperatively.