기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Dynamic Priority Evaluation Model for IS Adoption in Construction Management
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Dynamic Priority Evaluation Model for IS Adoption in Construction Management
  • Dynamic Priority Evaluation Model for IS Adoption in Construction Management
저자명
Yu. Jung-Ho
간행물명
KSCE journal of civil engineering
권/호정보
2012년|16권 6호|pp.893-904 (12 pages)
발행정보
대한토목학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The process of determining the order of Information Systems (IS) adoption in construction management processes, which are highly interrelated with one another, is generically dynamic because the IS adoption in one management process affects the other management processes, consequently changing the order of IS adoption throughout the entire process. In this paper, we discuss the Dynamic Priority Evaluation Model (DPEM). A priority evaluation criterion in DPEM is the expected IS benefits, which is represented by the efficiency increase of management processes through the IS adoption. The efficiency increase is determined as the most fundamental IS benefit through a survey. The prediction of the efficiency increase is based on four factors, namely the structurization level, beneficiary level, information utilization level, and information gain easiness level. These factors are verified through a case study. In addition to considering these four factors, the strategic importance of each management process and the relative importance of the four factors are incorporated into the calculation of the efficiency increase. Finally, the DPEM is expressed in a mathematical and process form to reflect the condition of the precedent IS adoption. Through another case study, the validity of the proposed DPEM method is verified for prioritizing the construction management processes for IS adoption based on the expected IS benefits. Ed: highlight - while the original is acceptable, the edited version is more fluent and legible. Further, DPEM is capable of considering more information than the experts are able to consider.