기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Hepatic FDG Uptake is not Associated with Hepatic Steatosis but with Visceral Fat Volume in Cancer Screening
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Hepatic FDG Uptake is not Associated with Hepatic Steatosis but with Visceral Fat Volume in Cancer Screening
  • Hepatic FDG Uptake is not Associated with Hepatic Steatosis but with Visceral Fat Volume in Cancer Screening
저자명
Pak. Kyoungjune,Kim. Seong-Jang,Kim. In Joo,Kim. Keunyoung,Kim. Heeyoung,Kim. So Jung
간행물명
Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : NMMI
권/호정보
2012년|46권 3호|pp.176-181 (6 pages)
발행정보
대한핵의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose We aimed to evaluate the relation between visceral fat volume and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake of the liver measured by maximum or mean standardized uptake value. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 96 consecutive records of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) performed for cancer screening between May 2011 and December 2011. Subjects were divided into 2 groups according to Hounsfield unit (HU) of the liver comparing with that of the spleen. The control group (20 women, 56 men) demonstrating HU of the liver equal or greater than that of the spleen included 76 patients, while the fatty liver group (2 women, 18 men) showing HU of the liver less than that of the spleen included 20 patients. We compared FDG uptake of the liver and visceral fat volume between two groups. We evaluated correlation of hepatic FDG uptake measured by maximum or mean standardized uptake value (SUV) with visceral fat volume and attenuation. Results The fatty liver disease group showed higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST)of ($24.42{pm}7.22$, p=0.012), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of ($25.16{pm}11.68$, p=0.001), body mass index (BMI) of ($24.58{pm}3.29$, p=0.021), and visceral fat volume ($3063.53{pm}1561.43$, p=0.011) than the control group. There were no statistically significant differences of mean standardized uptake value of the liver (liver $SUV_{mean}$) ($2.73{pm}0.19$, p=0.723), maximum standardized uptake value of the liver (liver $SUV_{max}$) ($3.39{pm}0.53$, p=0.8248) and liver $SUV_{mean}$/spleen $SUV_{mean}$ ($1.13{pm}0.10$, p=0.081) between the two groups. Strong correlations were shown between liver $SUV_{mean}$ and BMI (r=0.609, p<0.001) and between liver $SUV_{mean}$ and visceral fat volume (r=0.457, p<0.001). Liver $SUV_{max}$ was also strongly correlated with BMI (r=0.622, p=0.001) and visceral fat volume (r=0.547, p<0.001). There was no significant association of mean attenuation value of the liver (liver $HU_{mean}$) with liver $SUV_{mean}$ (r=-0.003, p=0.979) or liver $SUV_{max}$ (r=-0.120, p=0.244). Conclusion Hepatic FDG uptake quantified as $SUV_{mean}$ or $SUV_{max}$ is not correlated with hepatic steatosis but with visceral fat volume in cancer screening.