기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Prognostic Significance of Volume-based Metabolic Parameters by $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT in Gallbladder Carcinoma
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Prognostic Significance of Volume-based Metabolic Parameters by $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT in Gallbladder Carcinoma
  • Prognostic Significance of Volume-based Metabolic Parameters by $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT in Gallbladder Carcinoma
저자명
Yoo. Jang,Choi. Joon Young,Lee. Kyu Taek,Heo. Jin Seok,Park. Soo Bin,Moon. Seung Hwan,Choe. Yearn Seong,Lee. Kyung-Han,Kim. Byun
간행물명
Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : NMMI
권/호정보
2012년|46권 3호|pp.201-206 (6 pages)
발행정보
대한핵의학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose We investigated the prognostic values of volume-based metabolic parameters by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ($^{18}F$-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in gallbladder carcinoma patients and compared them with other prognostic parameters. Materials and Methods We enrolled 44 patients, who were initially diagnosed with gallbladder carcinoma and under-going $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT. Various metabolic volume-based PET parameters of primary tumors, including maximum and average standardized uptake values ($SUV_{max}$, $SUV_{avg}$), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), were measured in gallbladder carcinoma patients using mediastinal blood pool activity as a threshold SUV for determining the tumor boundaries. Overall survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with PET parameters and other clinical variables. For determining independent prognostic factors, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed. Results Of the 44 enrolled patients, cancer- or treatment-related death occurred in 30 (68.2 %). The mean clinical follow-up period was $22.2{pm}10.4$ m (range, 0.6-35.9 m). Univariate analysis demonstrated that clinical or pathologic TNM stage (P<0.001), treatment modality (P<0.001), MTV (cutoff = 135 $cm^3$, P=0.001), and TLG (cutoff = 7,090, P<0.05) were significant prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, both clinical or pathologic TNM stage [hazard ratio (HR)=2.019 (I vs II), 21.287 (I vs III), and 24.354 (I vs IV); P=0.001) and TLG (HR=2.930; P<0.05) were independent prognostic factors for predicting overall survival. Conclusions In gallbladder cancer, TLG of the primary tumor, a volume-based metabolic parameter, is a significant independent prognostic factor for overall survival in conjunction with the clinical or pathological TNM stage.