기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATTICE BOLTZMANN AND VOLUME OF FLUID METHOD FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL MULTIPHASE FLOWS
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATTICE BOLTZMANN AND VOLUME OF FLUID METHOD FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL MULTIPHASE FLOWS
  • A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATTICE BOLTZMANN AND VOLUME OF FLUID METHOD FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL MULTIPHASE FLOWS
저자명
Ryu. Seung-Yeob,Ko. Sung-Ho
간행물명
Nuclear engineering and technology : an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society
권/호정보
2012년|44권 6호|pp.623-638 (16 pages)
발행정보
한국원자력학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The volume of fluid (VOF) model of FLUENT and the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) are used to simulate two-phase flows. Both methods are validated for static and dynamic bubble test cases and then compared to experimental results. The VOF method does not reduce the spurious currents of the static droplet test and does not satisfy the Laplace law for small droplets at the acceptable level, as compared with the LBM. For single bubble flows, simulations are executed for various Eotvos numbers, Morton numbers and Reynolds numbers, and the results of both methods agree well with the experiments in the case of low Eotvos numbers. For high Eotvos numbers, the VOF results deviated from the experiments. For multiple bubbles, the bubble flow characteristics are related by the wake of the leading bubble. The coaxial and oblique coalescence of the bubbles are simulated successfully and the subsequent results are presented. In conclusion, the LBM performs better than the VOF method.