기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Different Paths to Citizenship Development of Korean College Students by Academic Discipline
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Different Paths to Citizenship Development of Korean College Students by Academic Discipline
  • 대학생 시민성 개발에 영향을 미치는 요인의 전공계열 간 차이 비교
저자명
Sooji Kim,Byung Shik Rhee
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2016년|54권 1호(통권169호)|pp.401-429 (29 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트(0.81MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

영문초록

This study was prompted by a consciousness of the need for today’s younger generations’ enhanced citizenship. Underlying assumptions are that higher education is essentially responsible for nurturing civic minds of the young and furthermore, that it is unquestionably capable of achieving this goal. In this regard, this research delved into college involvement predictors vital to students’ citizenship development and additionally, looked for different paths to development across academic disciplines. A stratified random sample of 5,093 juniors and seniors at 51 four-year Korean universities, was analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM 6.08). The findings indicated that students in Social Sciences reported the most development in citizenship during college, compared with those in Arts and Humanities, Business, Sciences, Engineering, and Professional fields. Another conclusive discovery was that ‘academic interaction with peers’ and ‘sense of belonging’ had positive effects on students’ citizenship development in all academic disciplines. Other college involvement predictors, however, had varying influences on students according to their affiliated academic disciplines. Finally, psychological factors such as sense of belonging had stronger impacts on students’ citizenship development than college involvement predictors in all academic fields except Business.

국문초록

본 연구는 오늘 날 대학생들의 시민성 개발에 대한 필요성을 인식하는 것에서 시작되었다. 고등교육 은 대학생 시민성 개발에 중요한 책임을 가지고 있으며, 대학 기관은 이러한 목표를 달성하는 데 주요 한 기능을 담당한다고 논의되어왔기 때문이다. 따라서, 대학생 시민성 개발에 영향을 미치는 대학 내 경험 요인들이 어떠한 것들이 있는지 탐구할 필요가 있으며, 더하여 이 요인들이 전공계열 간에 어떻 게 다르게 나타나는지 비교하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다. 본 연구에서는 시민성의 개념정의를 위해 인접학문의 선행연구 분석이 우선적으로 진행되었다. 분석에 사용한 자료는 연세대학교 글로벌 고등교 육 연구센터에서 수집한 자료로써, 우리나라에 소재한 51개 4년제 대학에 재학중인 5,093명의 학생들 의 설문 응답 결과물이다. 자료 분석은 자료의 위계적인 특성을 고려하여, 2수준 다층모형 분석방법(소 프트웨어: HLM 6.08)을 활용했다. 주요 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 타 전공계열의 학생들과 비교 했을 때, 사회과학계열 학생들이 대학진학 후 가장 많은 정도의 시민성이 개발되었다고 보고했다. 둘 째, ‘동료학생과의 학문적 교류’ 그리고 ‘대학 소속감’ 요인들은 전공계열과 상관 없이 모든 학생들의 시민성 개발에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 이외 대학 내 경험요인들은 전공계열 별로 다르게 학생들의 시민성 개발에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다. 마지막으로, 상경계열을 제외한 나머지 전공계열 학생들의 시민성 개발에는 대학 내 경험 요인들보다 심리적 요인들이 더 많은 영향력을 가 지는 것으로 나타났다.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Literature Review
III. Methods
IV. Results
V. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (74건)

  • Anaya, G. (1992). Cognitive development among college undergraduates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297-308.
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(3), 251-263.
  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
  • Boatwright, K. J., & Egidio, R. K. (2003). Psychological predictors of college women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of College Student Development, 44(5), 653-669.
  • Bok, Derek. (2006). Our underachieveing colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Bowen, H. R. (1977). Goals: The intended outcomes of higher education. Foundations of American Higher Education, 2, 23-37.
  • Bryant, A. N. (2011). The impact of campus context, college encounters, and religious/spiritual struggle on ecumenical worldview development. Research in Higher Education, 52(5), 441-459.
  • Bryant, A. N., Gayles, J. G., & Davis, H. A. (2012). The relationship between civic behavior and civic values: A conceptual model. Research in Higher Education, 53(1), 76-93.
  • Checkoway, B. (2001). Renewing the civic mission of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 125-147.
  • Chi, E., & Sun, K. (2007). Analyzing the construct of global citizenship and related variables. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 39(4), 115-134.
  • Chi, E. (2007). Validating the scale of global citizenship and examining the related variables. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20(2), 151-172.
  • Chickering, A. W. (1974). Commuting versus resident students: Overcoming the educational inequities of living off campus. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Cruce, T. M., & Moore, J. V. (2012). Community service during the first year of college: What is the role of past behavior?. Journal of College Student Development, 53(3), 399-417.
  • Donald, J. G. (2002). Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Dugan, J. P., & Komives, S. R. (2010). Influences on college students’ capacities for socially responsible leadership. Journal of College Student Development, 51(5), 525-549.
  • Engberg, M. E., & Mayhew, M. J. (2007). The influence of first-year “success” courses on student learning and democratic outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 49(2), 95-109.
  • Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., Guido, F. M., Patton, L. D., & Renn, K. A. (2009). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Eyler, J., Giles, D., & Braxton, J. (1997). The impact of service learning on college students. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 5-15.
  • Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (1969). The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203-220.
  • Gurin, P., Nagda, B. R. A., & Lopez, G. E. (2004). The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 17-34.
  • Hamrick, F. A., Evans, N. J., & Schuh, J. H. (2002). Foundations of student affairs practice: How philosophy, theory, and research strengthen educational outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hausmann, L. R., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803-839.
  • Holland, J. L. (1997). A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
  • Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis) engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555-575.
  • Hunter, S., & Brisbin, R. A. (2000). The impact of service learning on democratic and civic values. Political Science and Politics, 33(3), 623-626.
  • Hurtado, S. (2001). Linking diversity and educational purpose: How diversity affects the classroom environment and student development. In G. Orfield (Ed.), Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action (pp. 187-203). Cambridge: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
  • Hurtado, S. (2007). Linking diversity with the educational and civic missions of higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 30(2), 185 196.
  • Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students' sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324-345.
  • Hurtado, S., Engberg, M. E., Ponjuan, L., & Landreman, L. (2002). Students’ precollege preparation for participation in a diverse democracy. Research in Higher Education, 43(2), 163-186.
  • Hwang, K. J. (2005). An analysis on the studies of university ranking. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(2), 335-354.
  • Jacoby, B. (2009). Civic engagement in today’s higher education: An overview. In B. Jacoby & Associates (Eds.), Civic engagement in higher education (pp. 5-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jones, S. R., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Ireland, S. M. Y., Niehaus, E., & Skendall, K. C. (2012). The meaning students make as participants in short-term immersion programs. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 201-220.
  • Kim, Y. H. (2008). A study on the improvement direction of the citizneship educatio in university by the revised Morals Curriculum. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 16, 17-44.
  • Korean Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development. (2005). University Specialization Implementation Plan, p.25.
  • Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123-155.
  • Kuh, G. D., Douglas, K. B., Lund, J. P., & Ramin-Gyurnek, J. (1994). Student learning outside the classroom: Transcending artificial boundaries. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (No. 8). Washington: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
  • Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309-332.
  • Kuh, G. D., & Vesper, N. (1997). A comparison of student experiences with good practices in undergraduate education between 1990 and 1994. The Review of Higher Education, 21(1), 43-61.
  • Laird, T. F. N. (2005). College students’ experiences with diversity and their effects on academic self-confidence, social agency, and disposition toward critical thinking. Research in Higher education, 46(4), 365-387.
  • Laird, T. F. N., Engberg, M. E., & Hurtado, S. (2005). Modeling accentuation effects: Enrolling in a diversity course and the importance of social action engagement. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 448-476.
  • Laird, T. F. N., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469-494.
  • Lattuca, L. R., & Stark, J. (2009). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in action (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lee, D. H. (2007). A study on the strategies for ending the fixed university ranking system. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(3), 131-157.
  • Lopez, G. E. (2004). Interethnic contact, curriculum, and attitudes in the first year of college. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 75-94.
  • Lundberg, C. A., & Schreiner, L. A. (2004). Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis by student race/ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 549-565.
  • Marzana, D., Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2012). Young adults and civic behavior: The psychosocial variables determining it. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 40(1), 49-63.
  • Newell, W. H., & Davis, A. J. (1988). Education for citizenship: The role of progressive education and interdisciplinary studies. Innovative Higher Education, 13(1), 27-37.
  • Nie, N., & Hillygus, D. S. (2001). Education and democratic citizenship. In D. Ravitch & J. P. Viteritti (Eds.), Making good citizens: Education and civil society (pp. 30-57). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 1(1), 1-61.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on student development. In P. Mable & C. Schroeder (Eds.), Realizing the educational potential of residence halls (pp. 22-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Perry, J. L., & Katula, M. C. (2001). Does service affect citizenship? Administration & Society, 33(3), 330-365.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
  • Print, M., & Coleman, D. (2003). Towards understanding of social capital and citizenship education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(1), 123-149.
  • Reason, R. D., Cox, B. E., Quaye, B. R. L., & Terenzini, P. T. (2010). Faculty and institutional factors that promote student encounters with difference in first-year courses. The Review of Higher Education, 33(3), 391-414.
  • Rhee, B. S., & Choi, J. Y. (2009). Examining factors related to college students’ learning outcomes: Focusing on effects of college. The Journal of Educational Administration, 27(1), 199-222.
  • Rhee, B. S., & Kim, S. (2012). Differential pathways to generic skills development of male and female college students in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(4), 677-690.
  • Sax, L. J., & Astin, A. W. (1997). The benefits of service: Evidence from undergraduates. Educational Record, 78(3), 25-32.
  • Seifert, T. A., Goodman, K. M., Lindsay, N., Jorgensen, J. D., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., & Blaich, C. (2008). The effects of liberal arts experiences on liberal arts outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 107-125.
  • Sherrod, L. R., Flanagan, C., & Youniss, J. (2002). Dimensions of citizenship and opportunities for youth development: The what, why, when, where, and who of citizenship development. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 264-272.
  • Stake, J. E., & Hoffmann, F. L. (2001). Changes in student social attitudes, activism, and personal confidence in higher education: The role of women’s studies. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 411-436.
  • Son, B. H., Cho, Y.D., Lee, S. J., & Kim, H. S. (1999). The Korean civil society and civic ethics education. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 28, 1-44.
  • Taylor, J. A., & Trepanier-Street, M. (2007). Civic education in multicultural contexts: New findings from a national study. The Social Studies, 98(1), 14-18.
  • Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., Bjorklund, S. A., & Parente, J. M. (2001). Racial and ethnic diversity in the classroom: Does it promote student learning? The Journal of Higher Education, 72(5), 509-531.
  • Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty Do Matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153-184.
  • Vogelgesang, L. J., & Astin, A. W. (2000). Comparing the effects of community service and service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 7(1), 25-34.
  • Wagner, W., & Cilente, K. (2011). Contemporary topics in leadership. In S. Komives, J. Dugan, J. Owen, C. Slack, W. Wagner, & Associates (Eds.), The handbook for student leadership development (2nd ed.) (pp. 369-397). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Zhao, C. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138.
  • Zuniga, X., Williams, E. A., & Berger, J. B. (2005). Action-oriented democratic outcomes: The impact of student involvement with campus diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 660-678.
구매하기 (5,800)