기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
초등학생의 학교폭력 경험유형에 따른 어울림 학교폭력예방 프로그램 효과 분석
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 초등학생의 학교폭력 경험유형에 따른 어울림 학교폭력예방 프로그램 효과 분석
  • Analyses of the Effects of the Aulim school violence prevention program according to school bullying experience types among elementary school students
저자명
박효정, 김현진, 한미영
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2016년|54권 4호(통권172호)|pp.101-126 (26 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(1.02MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구는 초등학생의 학교폭력 경험유형에 대한 어울림 학교폭력예방 프로그램의 적용효과를 분석하여 어울림 프로그램 확산 지원에 대한 필요성을 제시하기 위해 수행되었다. 본 연구는 2015년 어울림프로그램에 참여한 162개 초등학교에서 학생 29,404명을 대상으로 하여 학교폭력 경험유형별로 어울림프로그램 전·후 심리사회적 역량 변화 및 학교폭력 경험유형별 어울림 프로그램 효과의 차이를 살펴보았다. 또한 이러한 심리사회적 변화가 학교적응에 어떻게 영향을 미치는가를 탐색하였다. 연구결과, 피해학생은 자기존중감, 의사소통이 긍정적으로 성장하였으며, 가해학생은 공감 및 갈등해결 역량이 성장하였고, 가피해학생과 무경험 학생은 감정조절을 제외하고 모든 심리사회적 역량이 긍정적으로 변화하였으며, 특히 무경험 학생의 심리사회적 발달 및 학교적응에도 더욱 효과적인 것으로 확인되었다. 이러한 연구결과는 어울림 프로그램이 모든 학생들의 심리사회적 발달에 긍정적 영향이 있을 뿐 아니라 긍정적인 학교문화 형성에도 기여할 것이라는 점을 시사하였다. 본 연구에서는 어울림 프로그램이 초등학교의 단위학교로 확산되는 데에 필요한 실증적 자료를 제시하였다는 점에서 연구의 의의가 있다.

영문초록

To suggest the importance of expending support on Aulim school violence prevention programs, this study investigated the effects of the Aulim school violence prevention programs according to elementary school students’ school bullying experience types. Participants were 29,404 students in 162 elementary schools participating 2015 Aulim programs. This study inquired the Aulim programs’ effects on changes of psychosocial competence according to school bullying experience types. Also, we investigated how the changes of pschosocial competence influenced students’ school adjustment. The results show that positive improvement were revealed in self-esteem, communication skills among victims, in empathy and conflict resolution among bullies, and all psychosocial competence except emotional regulation among bully-victims and non-school bullies. Especially, the programs were the most influential on non-school bullies’ psychosocial development and school adjustment. These results imply the Aulim programs will enhance all students’ positive development and school environment. This study suggested that the results supplies the practical evidences to expend the Aulim programs in elementary schools.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의
참고문헌

참고문헌 (38건)

  • 강경자(1996). 의사소통증진을 위한 훈련 프로그램의 효과. 석사학위논문, 창원대학교. (Translated in English) Kang, K. J. (1996). The effects of the communication training program. Master’s thesis, Changwon National University.
  • 교육부관계부처(2015. 3). 2015년 1차 학교폭력 실태조사 결과. 교육부 보도자료. (Translated in English) Ministry of Education (2015. March). Results of the 2015 1st school violence survey. Ministry of Education News release.
  • 김범수(2008). 학교폭력의 실태 분석과 예방 대책에 관한 연구. 사회과학연구, 17, 1-22. (Translated in English) Kim, B. S.(2008). A study of school bullying and measures of prevention. Social Science Research, 17, 1-22.
  • 김현진(2015). 인식된 교내폭력 환경과 긍정적인 관계가 형성된 학교풍토가 학습경험과 학업적응에 미치는 영향 탐색, 교육학연구, 53(1), 168-193. (Translated in English) Kim, H. J. (2015). Effects of Students’ Perceived School Bullying Environment and Positive Relationship School Environment on Academic Experiences and Adjustment, Korean Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 168-193.
  • 박성희(1996). 공감, 공감적 이해. 서울: 원미사. (Translated in English) Park, S. H. (1996). Empathy, empathic understanding. Seoul: Wonmisa.
  • 박인경(2010). 부모-자녀 의사소통에 따른 청소년의 공격성 및 정서조절능력. 석사학위논문, 한양대학교. (Translated in English) Park, I. K. (2010). Aggression and emotional regulation ability according to parent-adolescent communication. Master’s thesis, Hanyang University.
  • 박종효(2007). 학교폭력 가해행동에 대한 이해: 대인관계의 매개효과. 교육학연구, 45(1), 1-24. (Translated in English) Park, J. H.(2007). An Understanding of Aggressive Behavior of School Bullying and Violence: Mediation Effect of Interpersonal Relations, Korean Journal of Educational Research, 45(1), 1-24.
  • 박효정·이희현·김현진(2014). 학교폭력예방 표준 프로그램 개발 연구. 서울: 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Park, H. J., Lee, H. H., & Kim, H. J.(2014). Study on development of standard programs for prevention of school violence. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 박효정·한미영·김현진(2016). 어울림 학교폭력예방 프로그램의 적용효과 분석. 교육학연구, 54(3), 121-150. (Translated in English) Park, H. J., Han, M. Y., & Kim, H. J.(2014). Study on effects of applications for the Aulim school violence prevention program. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 54(3), 121-150.
  • 이규미·김명식(2008). 중학생 학교적응 척도의 확인적 요인분석을 통한 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 5(1), 27-40. (Translated in English) Lee, K, M. & Kim, M. S. (2008). A validation study of the school adjustment scale for middle school students. Korean Journal of School Psychology, 5(1), 27-40.
  • 이문자(2004). 초등학교 집단따돌림 가해행동의 생태체계적 변인에 관한 연구. 임상사회사업연구, 1(1), 41-62. (Translated in English) Lee, M. J (2004). A study on the eco-systematic variables of bullying behavior among elementary school students. Korean Academy of Clinical Social Work, 1(1), 41-62.
  • 최보가·전귀연(1993). 자아존중감 척도 개발에 관한 연구(I). 대한가정학회지, 31(2), 41-54. (Translated in English) Choi, B. G. & Jeon, G. Y. (1993). A study on the development of 「the self-esteem inventory」Family and Environment Research, 31(2), 41-54.
  • 하지원(2004). 아동이 지각한 가족관계 및 정서조절능력이 친구 간 갈등해결전략에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 숙명여자대학교. (Translated in English) Ha, J. W. (2004). The effects of children's recognized family relation and emotional regulation on conflict resolution strategies in their friendship. Master’s thesis, Sookmyung Women’s University.
  • 홍종관(2012). 학교폭력의 실태, 원인 그리고 대처에 관한 연구. 초등상담연구, 11(2), 237-259. (Translated in English) Hong, J. K.(2012). School violence ,the status of school violence ,causes of school violence ,school violence countermeasures. Korean Journal of Elementary Counseling, 11(2), 237-259.
  • Alsaker, F. D., & Valkanover, S. (2012). The Bernese program against victimization in kindergarten and elementary school. New Directions for Youth Development, 133, 15-28.
  • Andreou, E. (2001). Bully/victim problems and their associations with psychological constructs in 8-12 year old Greek schoolchildren. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 49-56.
  • Beran, T. N. (2006). Preparing teachers to manage school bullying: the hidden curriculum. Journal of Educational Though, 40(2), 119-128.
  • Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90-126.
  • Bienvenu, M. J. (1971). An interpersonal communication inventory. The J ournal of Communication, 21(4), 381-388.
  • Brown, E. C., Low, S., Smith, B. H., & Haggerty, K. P. (2011). Outcomes from a school-randomized controlled trial of Steps to Respect: A Bullying Prevention Program. School Psychology Review, 40(3), 423-443.
  • Cornell, D., Gregory, A., Huang, F., & Fan, Xitao. (2013). Perceived prevalence of teasing and bullying predicts high school dropout rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 138-149.
  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimentional approach to individual difference inempathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 10, 85.
  • Elliott, D. S., Olweus, D., Limber, S., & Mihalic, S.(1999). Blueprints for violence prevention: Bullying prevention program. Colorado, Denver: C & M Press.
  • Hyman, I., Kay, B., Tabori, A., Weber, M., Mahon, M., & Cohen, I. (2006). Bullying: Theory, research, and interventions. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 855-884). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Joshi, A. (2008). Conflict resolution between friends during middle childhood. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(2), 133-148.
  • Juvonen, J., Schacter, H. L., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). Can a school-wide bullying prevention program improve the plight of victims? Evidence for risk ×Intervention effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(4), 334-344.
  • Kress, J. S., & Elias, M. J. (2006). School-based social and emotional learning programs. In K. A. Renniger & I. E. Sigel (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology(pp. 592-618), New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Low, S., & Ryzin, M. V. (2014). The moderating effects of school climate on bullying prevention efforts. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(3), 306-319.
  • O’Moor, M., & Kirkham, C.(2001). Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 269-283.
  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge. MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Olweus, D. (2000). Norway. In P. K. Smith et al. (Eds.). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 22-48). London: Routledge.
  • Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 239-269.
  • Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). The Olweus bullying prevention program. In Shane R. Jimerson, Susan M. Swearer, Dorothy L. Espelage(Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 377-401). New York: Routledge.
  • Salmivalli, C., & Poskiparta, E. (2012). Making bullying prevention a priority in Finnish schools: The KiVa antibullying program. New Directions for Youth Development, 133, 41-53.
  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27-56.
  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle(Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Osks, CA: Sage.
  • Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35(1), 3-25.
  • Wilton, M. M., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2000). Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims of bullying: Characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles and relevant contextual factors. Social Development, 9(2), 226-245.
구매하기 (5,500)