This study sought to make theoretical reviews on effective therapeutic interventions for married couples in domestic violence. In Korea, there have been so far still insufficient therapeutic interventions for those couples in regard to possible backgrounds behind domestic violence between married couples as well as different seriousness depending on the extent of such domestic marital violence. Up to date, therapeutic interventions have been focused on victims accommodated in shelters in pursuit of conflict arbitration and relationship improvement for couples in domestic violence, gradually shifting toward offender as principal of behavioral violence at home. However, in terms of causation of domestic violence, recent domestic and foreign academic worlds come to widely accept standpoints of family system theory, gradually turning from conventional feministic viewpoints that lay entire responsibility for behavioral violence on any one party alone as principal of domestic violence. The family system theory focuses on examining mechanisms in which each party of married couple contributes to marital violence, so that both parties of couple can make changes to such mechanisms at the same time. Therefore, it has been considered consequential so far that both parties of married couple should join group counseling therapy process together in the interest of useful therapeutic intervention. However, in favor of more effective therapeutic interventions, it is advisable that careful consideration on appropriateness of marital therapy as emphasized from feministic viewpoints should be deemed as therapeutic preconditions.