기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
협력학습에서 학습자의 자기조절과 협력적 자기조절의 관계: 집단 응집성의 조절효과를 중심으로
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 협력학습에서 학습자의 자기조절과 협력적 자기조절의 관계: 집단 응집성의 조절효과를 중심으로
  • The relationship between self regulation and co-regulation in a collaborative learning environment: Moderating effect of group cohesiveness
저자명
임규연, 박하나, 김시원
간행물명
교육방법연구KCI
권/호정보
2015년|27권 2호(통권38호)|pp.211-228 (18 pages)
발행정보
한국교육방법학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.54MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구는 협력학습 상황에서 자기조절과 협력적 자기조절 간의 관계를 실증적으로 분석하고, 집단 응집성이 그 과정에서 조절변수로서의 역할을 수행하는지 알아보고자 하였다. 협력적 자기조절은 다른 사람들과의 상호작용 과정 속에서 개인의 자기조절이 어떻게 변화하고 정교화 되는지 설명하기 위한 개념으로, 개인의 자기조절 스킬을 집단 맥락으로 전환하는 과정으로 정의된다. 이는 상대적으로 최근에 조명을 받고 있는 구인으로서, 본 연구를 통해 협력적 자기조절에 대한 이해를 확장하고 협력학습 환경 설계에 대한 시사점을 제공하는 것이 연구의 목적이다. 이를 위해 대학생 61명을 대상으로 소집단 협력 프로젝트를 진행하고 관련 설문을 통해 자료를 수집한 후 위계적 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, 학습자의 자기조절은 협력적 자기조절을 예측하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 사회적 응집성은 학습자의 자기조절과 협력적 자기조절 간의 관계를 조절하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 과업 응집성은 학습자의 자기조절과 협력적 자기조절 간의 관계를 조절하는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 협력에 있어서 집단의 구성원보다는 과업에 대한 긍정적 몰입이 중요한 역할을 하므로, 학습자에게 의미 있는 과업을 제시하고 그에 대한 집단의 목표를 세울 수 있도록 지원하는 교수자의 역할이 중요하다는 시사점을 제공한다.

영문초록

This study analyzed the moderating effect of group cohesiveness on the relationship between self regulation and co-regulation in a collaborative learning environment. Seventy three college students participated in a small group based collaborative project, and the data from sixty one were used for hierarchical regression analysis. The results reported that self regulation predicted co-regulation, and task cohesiveness moderated the relationship between self regulation and co-regulation, while social cohesiveness did not. This study investigated a relatively new construct, co-regulation, in a collaborative learning context, and reported the importance of group cohesiveness to strengthen the relationship between self-regulation and co-regulation. Also, this study suggested the significant role of instructors who should facilitate group cohesiveness in terms of task by providing meaningful collaborative tasks as well as opportunities to establish shared goals and procedures within teams.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (42건)

  • 강명희, 윤성혜, 임현진, 유영란 (2012). 메타인지, 인지된 상호작용, 실재감의 웹기반 협력학습 성과 예측력. 평생학습사회, 8(2), 111-130.
  • 봉미미, 김성일, Johnmarshall Reeve, 임효진, 이우걸, Yi Jiang, 김진호, 김혜진, 노아름, 노언경, 백선희, 송주연, 신지연, 안현선, 우연경, 원성준, 이계형, 이민혜, 이선경, 이선영, 이지수, 정윤경, Catherine Cho, 황아름 (2012). SMILES (Student Motivation in the Learning Environment Scales): 학습환경에서의 학생동기척도. 고려대학교 두뇌동기연구소 홈페이지 http://bmri.korea.ac.kr/korean/research/assessment_scales/list.html?id=assessment에서 인출.
  • 이현우 (2012). 과제기반 협력학습에서 소집단 구성원의 자기조절학습 수준이 집단자기조절, 소집단 성과 및 활동 만족도에 미치는 영향. 교육방법연구, 24(1), 171-183.
  • 임철일 (2005). 자기조절학습을 지원하는 기업의 이러닝 학습관리체제의 개발과 효과에 관한 연구. 교육공학연구, 21(4), 77-100.
  • 장혜정, 장은정 (2008). 웹기반 소집단 협력학습에서 학습자 성격 특성과 상호작용자 유형에 따른 학습결과 분석. 교육공학연구, 24(1), 137-167.
  • 한정선, 김동식 (2009). CSCL 환경에서 협력학습 지원 도구의 유형이 협력적 지식 구축에 미치는 영향. 교육정보미디어연구, 15(4), 203-229.
  • Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg(Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31-63). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • Bernthal, P. R., & Insko, C. A. (1993). Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of social and task cohesion. Group and Organizational Management, 18, 66-87.
  • Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.
  • Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Phychologist, 18(2), 88-108.
  • DiDonato, N. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41(1), 25-47. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9
  • Evans, C. R., & Jarvis, P. A. (1980). Group cohesion: A review and re-evaluation. Small Group Behavior, 11, 359-370.
  • Farris, G. F., & Lim, F. G. (1969). Effects of performance on leadership, cohesiveness, influence, satisfaction, and subsequent performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 490-497.
  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
  • Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
  • Gonzalez, M. G., Burke, M. J., Santuzzi, A. M., & Bradley, J. C. (2003). The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 629-648.
  • Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 121-173.
  • Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240-264.
  • Hadwin, A., Wozney, L., & Pontin, O. (2005). Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher-student discourse about a graduate research portfolio. Instructional Science, 33(5), 413-450.
  • Huang, C. C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(11), 786-797.
  • Jarvela, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., Koivuniemi, M., & Jarvenoja, H. (2014). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125-142.
  • Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 52(3), 47-66.
  • Langfred, C. W. (1998). Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? Small Group Research, 29(1), 124.
  • Lee, H., & Bonk, C. J. (2014). Collaborative Learning in the Workplace: Practical Issues and Concerns. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 7(2), 10-17.
  • Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological bulletin, 115(2), 210.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
  • Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition & Instruction, 29(4), 375-415. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
  • Rowe, F. A., & Rafferty, J. A. (2013). Instructional Design Interventions for Supporting Self-Regulated Learning: Enhancing Academic Outcomes in Postsecondary E-Learning Environments. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(4), 590-601.
  • Saab, N. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition & Learning, 7(1), 1-6. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9085-5
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Turner, P. J., & Smith, P. M. (1984). Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 97-111.
  • Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning & Instruction, 19(2), 128-143. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
  • Wang, T. (2011). Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1801-1812. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.003
  • Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R. & Carron, A. V. (1985). The Measurement of Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Ontario, Canada: Sports Dynamics.
  • Williams, E. A., Duray, R., & Reddy, V. (2006). Teamwork orientation, group cohesiveness, and student learning: A study of the use of teams in online distance education. Journal of Management Education, 30(4), 592-616.
  • Zaccaro, S. (1991). Nonequivalent association between forms of cohensiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for miltidimentionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 131(3), 389-399.
  • Zaccaro, S., Gualtieri, J., & Minionis, D. (1995). Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal urgency. Military Psychology, 7(2), 77-93.
  • Zaccaro, S., & Lowe, C. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547-558.
  • Zimmerman, B. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307-313.
  • Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
  • Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290.
  • Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student difference in self-regulated learning: Related grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.
구매하기 (4,700)