This study aims to examine kindergarten teachers awareness of objective, methods, domains and indicators for kindergarten evaluation and satisfaction and applications of evaluation results. To do this study, 144 public kindergarten teachers who have experienced in kindergarten evaluation in the city of Daejeon were given survey questionares. The findings were as follows; First, quality of kindergarten curriculum should be most highly considered in the main objective of the evaluation. Concerning the evaluation cycle, the respondents considered that it would be better to implement it once every three years. In terms of evaluation process, both in-house and in-site evaluations are favored. In order to activate kindergarten evaluation, its process and documentations should be simplified. Second, it is thought that evaluation items and indicators are inappropriately extensive and far-reaching, so that its indicators should be curtailed based on domains of the evaluation. In addition to national indicators, self-indicators should be included in the evaluation. It is believed that curriculum is the most important domain in the evaluation. Third, the largest group expressed a moderate level of satisfaction with the kindergarten evaluation system. Cases of excellent kindergartens in each evaluation domain should be posted on the website of office of education and evaluation results should be used as feedback for the development and implementation of kindergarten curriculum.