In recent years the Western situation of the relation of religion and public sector is emerging in an opposite and contrary way as it has been. Nowadays, religion is a re-emerging public and civic issues in the world especially after 9/11 in the West. Surprisingly, in the European community and in North America, issues pertaining to religion and public affairs are presenting themselves in an urgently appealing way. In the world of religious studies, many religious discussions have begun to reformulate and to redefine issues that pertain to the relation of religion with public or civic life. I think that this situation is not far different in the Eastern situation.
The traditional way of life—irrespective of th Western or the Eastern—is facing the challenge from the effect of the immigration, the religious pluralism, the regional integration and the globalization, and so on. Especially the new reality of the diverse world views to be fundamentally rooted in the various religions is not the future event but the actual present fact. Nevertheless the educational fields do not pay attention to this reality in relation to religious dimension of the contemporary human life. As its result, in educational fields many conflicts and misunderstandings would increase to form a new segregation or racism to be caused from the lack of the understanding of others' religions.
Above all in this situation for the correction of the religious prejudice I do think that comprehensive religious education as part of the public or the civic education should be reconsidered in the pluralistic religious world. Especially I think that it should be considered in the public education.
For the fulfillment of the comprehensive new religious education, I revisited one of the seminal thinkers in the history of education or religious education. I think that he is Granville Stanley Hall. In this paper, I tried to articulate his idea of religious education as a part of civic education to be still good for the present situation. His idea is so broad that in this paper I limited my research to his idea of religious education for the childhood corresponding their natural religiosity.
In the development of this paper I came to realize that his understanding of the human nature as the religious was the same as the human understanding as homo religious. Due to this fundamental human understanding in his childhood education religious dimension was not one of various secondary elements but the key component. I think that his view should be reconsidered critically for the new paradigm for the 21st childhood education.