기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Comparative Safety of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Comparative Safety of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
  • Comparative Safety of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
저자명
Erasmo Saucedo Uribe, Samuel Enrique Olivares Mundo, Raul Ricardo Medrano Garza, Fernando Diaz Gonzalez-Colmenero, Lorena Martinez Sanchez, Cesar Bigran Espinosa Cantu, Martin Moreno Arellano, Yessica Yaneth Herrera Montemayor, Patricia Lizeth Castillo Morales, Samantha Berenice Medrano Juarez, Sandra Sabrina Rojo-Garza
간행물명
Psychiatry InvestigationKCI,SCIE,SSCI,SCOPUS
권/호정보
2023년|20권 12호|pp.1112-1125 (14 pages)
발행정보
대한신경정신의학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(1.89MB)
주제분야
의약학
서지반출

국문초록

Objective To find the safety of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) compared to each other, and/or placebo in the treatment of schizophrenia (SCZ) and/or schizoaffective disorder (SZA). Methods We performed a systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety of LAIs versus other LAIs or placebo in adults diagnosed with SCZ or SZA. The primary outcomes were treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious treatment emergent adverse events (STEAEs), and deaths. The secondary outcomes included treatment discon-tinuations due to adverse events and all-cause discontinuations. Results Seventeen RCTs were included (n=7,908). There were no significant differences between LAIs and placebo in the risk of pre-senting TEAEs. LAIs had a significant lower risk of presenting STEAEs except for aripiprazole. No significant differences in deaths were found. LAIs showed a significant protective effect against all-cause discontinuation, except for haloperidol. Only aripiprazole had a sig-nificantly lower risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Conclusion We found no significant differences in the risk of presenting TEAEs between LAIs and placebo. The majority of LAIs had a significantly lower risk of presenting STEAEs than placebo. Development of international guidelines for the report of safety outcomes re-lated to antipsychotics especially for LAIs in clinical trials could minimize report and interpretation biases and improve the accuracy of posterior meta-analysis.

영문초록

Objective To find the safety of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) compared to each other, and/or placebo in the treatment of schizophrenia (SCZ) and/or schizoaffective disorder (SZA). Methods We performed a systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety of LAIs versus other LAIs or placebo in adults diagnosed with SCZ or SZA. The primary outcomes were treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious treatment emergent adverse events (STEAEs), and deaths. The secondary outcomes included treatment discon-tinuations due to adverse events and all-cause discontinuations. Results Seventeen RCTs were included (n=7,908). There were no significant differences between LAIs and placebo in the risk of pre-senting TEAEs. LAIs had a significant lower risk of presenting STEAEs except for aripiprazole. No significant differences in deaths were found. LAIs showed a significant protective effect against all-cause discontinuation, except for haloperidol. Only aripiprazole had a sig-nificantly lower risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Conclusion We found no significant differences in the risk of presenting TEAEs between LAIs and placebo. The majority of LAIs had a significantly lower risk of presenting STEAEs than placebo. Development of international guidelines for the report of safety outcomes re-lated to antipsychotics especially for LAIs in clinical trials could minimize report and interpretation biases and improve the accuracy of posterior meta-analysis.

목차

INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION

구매하기 (4,300)