기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
敎科心理學과 思考力 敎育의 關係
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 敎科心理學과 思考力 敎育의 關係
  • Psychology of School Subjects and Thinking Education
저자명
李龍南
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
1994년|32권 1호(통권76호)|pp.1-15 (15 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR| 이미지(7.28MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

이 논문에서는 사고력에 대한 접근방법으로서 일반적 문제해결력과 특수영역적 문제해결력을 검토한다. 그리고 최근에는 특수영역적 접근이 우세함을 밝히고 그에 따라 지식의 영역 분류와 그 표상방법의 중요성을 제시한다. 또 정보처리적 접근에서 최근에 거둔 각 교과별 지식의 획득과정에 대한 연구를 검토해 교과교육을 통한 사고력 교육의 가능성을 제시한다. 마지막으로 사고력 교육 및 연 구에 대한 이러한 접근의 한계를 지적하고 새로운 가능성을 탐색한다.

영문초록

The purpose of this study was to inquire the relationship between thinking education and psychology of school subjects. Thinking has been studied in two ways: general problem solving and domain-specific problem solving. Recently more emphasis has been given to domain-specific approach by information processing - oriented cognitive psychologists, because problem solving needs domain- specific knowledge. Each domain of knowledge can be classified into propositional or declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge. Declarative knowledge is represented by propositions and these form networks, while procedual knowledge is represented by productions and these form production systems. Expert and novice problem solvers show differences both in declarative and procedural knowledge. Experts’ declarative knowledge is better organized and elaborated than that of novices’, and the former ' s procedural knowledge is better automatized than that of the latter's. Thinking and knowledge acqusition of school subjects is closely related, and so recent cognitive psychologists investigate learning processes of school subjects such as reading, writing, mathematics, science(social and natural) , and so on. However, more research needs to be done in other fields such as art, music, ethics, and so on. If knowledge acquisition processes are known, better teaching methods would be implied in those subjects, and thinking education would be more effective. Studies are few which deal with the relationship between thinking and knowledge acquisition in Korea. Therefore, many studies are needed in this field. Researchers also have to attend to the study of wisdom, because wisdom is the crux of thinking and famous researchers such as Stemberg has begun to study wisdom only recently.

목차

요약
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 思考力 硏究의 方向
Ⅲ. 知識의 分類와 表象
Ⅳ. 敎科心理學的 探究
Ⅴ. 論議 및 結論
<참고문헌>
Abstract

구매하기 (4,400)