The effects of input-enhanced and output-enhanced grammar instruction on the learning of English verb tenses and relative clauses

Hwang; Hee Jeong

서지반출

영문초록

The present study investigated whether different types of form-focused instruction, input-enhanced or output-enhanced, might be effective in improving low-proficiency learners' English knowledge about specific linguistic forms. The participants were 111 first-year Korean university students enrolled in an English conversation course. They were assigned to three groups; 35 students in the input-enhanced group (TIE), 33 in the output-enhanced group (DICT), and 45 in the control group (CG). English verb tenses and relative clauses were selected as the target structures. Pre- and post-tests were conducted to measure the effectiveness of different types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of the target forms. Pre- and post-questionnaires were administered to examine the extent of the students' perceptions and attitudes towards the English instruction that they received. The study discovered that both input-enhanced and output-enhanced instruction were more effective than traditional grammar instruction in developing grammatical knowledge about verb tenses, while output-enhanced instruction was more effective than input-enhanced and traditional grammar instruction with respect to the learning of relative clauses. The results of the questionnaires indicated that learners who performed the TIE task and the dictogloss task showed positive changes in their perceptions about the English instruction that they received; only those in the dictogloss task showed positive changes in their attitudes towards the instruction. Based on the results, the limitations of the study and the pedagogical implications are provided.

국문초록

본 연구의 목적은 초급수준의 대학생들을 대상으로 영어의 동사시제와 관계대명사를 목표형태로 형태 초점교수법의 입력강화와 출력강화활동의 학습효과를 검증하고, 학습자들의 형태초점교수법에 대한인식과 태도의 변화를 살펴보는 것이다. 연구 참여자들은 필수과목인 영어회화강좌를 수강하는 여섯 개 분반의 1학년 학생 111명이다. 이들 여섯 개의 분반을 무작위로 3개의 집단 즉, 입력강화집단35명, 출력강화집단33명, 비교집단45명 (각집단에2개의분반배정)으로 구성하여 평가시험과 설문조사를 사전 사후로 실시하였다. 연구결과에 따르면, 동사시제학습에 있어서는 입력강화집단과 출력강화집단 모두가 비교집단보다 높은 성취도를 보였고, 관계대명사습득에 있어서는 출력강화집단이 입력강화집단과 비교집단보다 더 우수하였다. 또한, 형태초점교수법에 대한 학습자들의 인식과 태도에 있어서는 출력강화집단의경우, 자신들이 받은 형태초점교수법에 대한 인식과 태도에서 긍정적인 변화가있었고, 입력강화집단은 인식에만 긍정적인 변화를보였다. 본 연구가 향후 초급수준의 학생들에게 효과적인 형태초점 교수전략을 제공하기위한 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있기를 기대한다.

I. INTRODUCTION
II. LITERATURE REVIEW 
1. Focus on Form Instruction Techniques
2. Studies on Input-enhanced Grammar Instruction 
3. Studies on Output-enhanced Grammar Instruction 
III. METHOD
1. Participants 
2. Target Structures
3. Instruments 
4. Procedures  
5. Data Analysis 
IV. RESULTS 
References 
국문요약

키워드

focus on form instruction input-enhanced output-enhanced typographical input enhancement dictogloss 형태초점교수법 입력강화 출력강화 시각적입력강화 딕토글로스

참고문헌 (54건)

강문구(2007). 영어시제의 효율적인 교수․학습 전략. 영어어문교육, 13(3), 133-156.
박정주, 이희경(2009). 중학교 영어 문법 수업에서 Dictogloss의 효과에 관한 연구. 외국어교육, 16(1), 147-171.
송윤희, 박매란(2012). 영어 시제 학습에서 형태초점 교수법의 효과. 영어어문교육, 18(4), 361-384.
성상희, 이상기(2013). 형태초점접근법의 명시성의 정도가 중학교 영어학습자의 관계대명사 구문습득에 미치는 영향. 영어학, 13(3), 549-570.
장은혜, 김은주(2012). 장르에 따른 dictogloss 활동이 한국 중학생들의 영어 듣기능력과 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 교과교육학연구, 16(4), 1021-1044.
Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (pp.259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Choi, S. Y. (2009). The effects of form focused instruction based on three functions of output, Unpublished master's thesis. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. Seoul.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1999). Input-based approaches to teaching grammar: A review of classroom-oriented research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 64-80.
Ellis, R. (2001). SLA Research and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University.
Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second language Acquisition, 21(2), 285-301.
Flynn, S. W. (1989). The role of the head-initial/head-final parameter in the acquisition of English relative clauses by adult Spanish and Japanese speakers. In S. M. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 8
Fotos, S. (1993). Consciousness raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance vs. formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14(4), 385-407.
Han, Y. (2007). Exploring task effects: Focus on form in dictogloss and grammar-discovery tasks. The New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature, 49(2), 195-215.
Harley, B. (1994). Appealing to consciousness in the L2 classroom. AILA Review, 11, 57-68.
Hwang, J. B. (2001). Focus on form and the L2 learning of English unaccusative verbs. English Teaching, 56(3), 111-133.
Izumi, S. (2002). Out, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
Jin, S. H. (2013). A study on the effects of dictogloss on English writing in Korean middle school. Studies in English Education 18(2), 115-134.
Kim, B. J. (2007). The effects of different types of form-focused instruction on Korean university students' writing accuracy. English Language & Literature Teaching, 13(2), 63-90.
Kim, S. J., & Ma, J. H. (2014). The effects of dictation and dictogloss in the high school English class: Focusing on English collocation. English 21, 27(1), 259-278.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach. New York: Pergamon.
LaPierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Toronto, Toronto.
Lee, S. K., & Huang, H. T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307-331.
Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, L., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 217-258). Honolul
Long, M. H. (1983a). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359-382.
Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsc (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on formin classroomsecond language acquisition (pp.15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Aquisition, 20(1), 51-81.
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471-497.
Mayo, M. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 156-175.
Murray, H. (1994). Inside dictogloss - An investigation of a small group writing task. Bulletin suisse de linguistique, 60, 67-84.
Nakamori, T. (2002). Teaching relative clauses: How to handle a bitter lemon for Japaneses learners and English teachers. ELT Journal, 56(1), 29-40.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2007). Issues in form-focused instruction and teacher education. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education (pp. 7-16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 459-481.
Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45-99.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7(2), 118-132.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (1998a). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In J. Cummins & M. Swain (Eds.), Bilingualism in education (pp. 116-137). New York: Longman.
Swain, M. (1998b). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams(Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
VanPatten, B., & Cardierno, T. (1993a). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 45-57.
VanPatten, B., & Cardierno, T. (1993b). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 495-510.
VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman, D.. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham & R. Weber(Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and practice (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
White, J. (1998). Getting learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on formin classroomsecond language acquisition (pp.85-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, A. (2011). The effectiveness of repeating dictogloss in promoting new vocabulary noticing. English Teaching, 66(1), 65-90.
Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 139-155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeo, K. H. (2002). The effects of dictogloss: A technique of focus on form. English Teaching, 57(1), 149-168.

구매하기 (6,000)

장바구니

영문초록

국문초록

목차

키워드

참고문헌 (54건)