기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
주조도재관과 도재전장주조관의 치경부 변연적합도에 관한 비교 연구
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 주조도재관과 도재전장주조관의 치경부 변연적합도에 관한 비교 연구
  • A Comparative Study on the Marginal Fit between Castable Ceramic(Dicor) Crowns and Metal-Ceramic Crowns
저자명
김정호,양재호,이선형,Kim. Jeong-Ho,Yang. Jae-Ho,Lee. Sun-Hyung
간행물명
대한치과보철학회지
권/호정보
1988년|26권 1호|pp.51-61 (11 pages)
발행정보
대한치과보철학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The recently introduced castable glass ceramics incorporate properties characteristic of natural teeth and they are regarded as an ideal material to restore lost tooth structure. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of castable ceramic crown with that of the metal-ceramic crown in the process of heat treatment. Two master dies for castable ceramic crowns and metal-ceramic crowns were fabricated from being cast with the base metal. Each master die was duplicated with addition silicone and hard stone. Ten castable ceramic crowns were made on each hard stone die and their marginal openings were measured three times first, after casting; second, after ceramming; third, after shading. The other ten metal-ceramic crowns were made on each hard stone die and their marginal openings were measured three times : first, after casting; second, after degassing; third, after porcelain veneering. Each crown was seated on its master die with the constant force delivered by loading jig. And then, marginal openings were measured on four locations by optical projector at X50 magnification. The results were as follows: 1. The mean marginal openings of castable ceramic crowns were $31.1{pm}12.7{mu}m$ after casting; $44.6{pm}12.8{mu}m$ after ceramming; $51.2{pm}16.8{mu}m$ after shading. 2. The mean marginal openings of the metal-ceramic crowns were $26.2{pm}13.8{mu}m$ after casting; $29.8{pm}10.3{mu}m$ after degassing; $38.0{pm}14.5{mu}m$ after porcelain veneering. 3. There was significant increase in the marginal opening of castable ceramic crowns after ceramming, while metal-ceramic crowns sho(wed significant increase after porcelain veneering (p<0.05). 4. Marginal fit of metal-ceramic crown was better than that of castable ceramic crown (p<0.01).