A bioequivalence study of the $Kerola^{circledR}$ intramuscular injections (Dongkwang Pharmaceutical Co., Korea) to the $Tarasyn^{circledR}$ intramuscular injections (Roche Co., Korea), formulations of ketorolac tromethamine (KTR), was conducted. Sixteen healthy Korean male subjects were received each formulation at the dose of 30 mg as KTR in a $2{ imes}2$ crossover study. There was an one-week washout period between the doses. Plasma concentrations of KTR were monitored by a HPLC method. AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal method. $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were compiled from the plasma drug concentration-time data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that there are no differences in AUC, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ between the formulations. The differences between the formulations in these parameters were all far less than 20% (i.e., 3.65, 2.59 and 4.35% for AUC, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ respectively). Minimum detectable differences (%) at ${alpha}=0.1$ and $1-{eta}=0.8$ were 12.87, 13.44, 20.62%, for AUC, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals for these parameters were also within 20%. These results satisfy the bioequivalence criteria of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) guidelines (No. 1998-86). Therefore, these results indicate that the two formulations of KTR are bioequivalent.