International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities) was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 13 December 2006, Korea has signed the Convention
on March 30, 2007. This year the deeper meaning became the year that the 10th anniversary of the adoption
of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Therefore, to study and review the issues
section of the above Convention in this paper. Contents part in whether to go for a defined above Convention
of disability and disabled people as disability rights guaranteed model you want to go to the non-discrimination
model, disability, gender issues, movement problems of accessibility and private, respect and acceptance issues for
people with disabilities difference, independent living issues, rehabilitation problems etc., monitoring the problem
was a difference in point of view. Being a problem, it is that the first inpatient mental health treatment
possible without the free consent of the patient is in violation of the International Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities. In particular, forced hospitalization regime is serious problem. When the country
mental health is a duty, such as protective parents, spouses, adult children agreed and the doctor diagnosed a
person is forced to be hospitalized. Therefore, corrective recommendations in a bar in Sustaining the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities United Nations force in 2015 to improve the admission system. In fact, if you press
the 129 emergency call picks up the car to force the songdan come. If strong resistance to consult a doctor
when the situation called a stabilizer to scan one people shot an elephant. Institutional remedies for this,
depending on how the mental health hospital charged a local mental health screening Tribunal and can be
charged in court according to the relief of human trafficking laws. However, if you have it accepted mimihayeo
actual effectiveness is questionable. So watch harirago be improved in the direction of a court decision forced the
hospitalization itself, like Germany or the United States. Otherwise, the doctor thought that this person is to be
diagnosed when a person has two doctors, but would be desirable to doctors in other hospitals.