기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
학생 및 대학 특성이 교수-학생 상호작용에 미치는 영향 분석
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 학생 및 대학 특성이 교수-학생 상호작용에 미치는 영향 분석
  • The Effects of Individual and Institutional Characteristics on Student-Faculty Interaction
저자명
김세희, 고장완
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2016년|54권 4호(통권172호)|pp.263-293 (31 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(1.1MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구의 목적은 교수-학생 상호작용에 영향을 미치는 학생수준 및 대학수준의 영향요인을 탐색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 한국교육개발원에서 실시한 2012 한국 대학생 학습과정에 관한 설문조사에 응답한 32개 4년제 대학의 학생 18,195명의 자료를 다층모형을 통해 분석하였다. 종속변인은 학생이 인식하는 교수와의 교류 정도를 측정한 교수-학생 상호작용이었으며, 학생수준 독립변인에는 성별, 아버지학력, 어머니 학력, 학년, 전공계열, 수업참여, 다른 구성원과의 교류, 대학 강조점 인식이, 대학수준 독립변인에는 대학의 소재지, 설립유형, 규모가 포함되었다. 연구 결과, 학생수준에서는 남학생, 학년, 공학계열, 수업참여, 다른 구성원과의 교류, 대학 강조점 인식이 교수-학생 상호작용에 긍정적인 영향을주는 것으로 파악되었으며, 대학수준에서는 비수도권 소재 대학의 교수-학생 상호작용이 수도권 소재대학에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 여학생과 수도권 대학 학생의교수-학생 상호작용에 더욱 관심을 가질 필요가 있으며, 대학은 일방적인 강의식 수업을 지양하고 지도교수제를 기반으로 운영되는 동아리 및 학습 커뮤니티 활동을 장려해야 함을 제언하였다.

영문초록

The purpose of the study was to identify what individual and institutional characteristics affect the level of student-faculty interaction (SFI). To achieve this objective, two-level hierarchical linear model analysis was employed. The sample was 18,195 undergraduate students attending 32 four-year universities who responded to the 2012 National Assessment of Student Engagement in Learning conducted by Korean Educational Development Institute. The dependent variable was SFI, which was about the frequency of interaction between students and faculty members. Individual-level independent variables included gender, father’s education level, mother’s educational level, year in college, major fields, participation in classes, interaction with other members in college, and perception on college’s supportive environment, and institutional-level independent variables consisted of location, institutional type, and size. The results of analysis revealed that parts of the individual-level variables, namely gender, year in college, engineering major, participation in classes, interaction with other members in college, and perception on college’s supportive environment, had a significantly positive effect on SFI, and that location, among institution-level variables, significantly affected SFI. Related policy implications were discussed.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 분석
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 논의, 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (47건)

  • 강상진(1995). 다층통계모형의 방법론적 특성과 활용방법. 교육평가연구, 8(2), 63-94. (Translated in English) Kang, S. J. (1995). Methodological characteristics of statistical multilevel models and applicational procedure. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 8(2), 63-94.
  • 강상진(2016). 다층모형. 서울: 학지사. (Translated in English) Kang, S. J. (2016). Multilevel models. Seoul; Hakjisa.
  • 고장완·김현진·김명숙(2011). 대학생의 학습 및 비학습 경험이 인지적·정의적 성과와 수업 만족도에 미치는 영향. 교육행정학연구, 29(4), 169-194. (Translated in English) Ko, J., Kim, H. J., & Kim, M. S. (2011). The impact of students' college experiences on students' cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes, and instructional satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Administration, 29(4), 169-194.
  • 고장완·박수미(2016). 전공계열에 따른 학생참여 및 지각된 학습성과의 학년별 차이 분석. 한국교육, 43(1), 209-230. (Translated in English) Ko, J., & Park, S. (2016). An analysis of the relationships between student engagement and perceived learning outcomes by academic disciplines. The Journal of Korean Education, 43(1), 209-230.
  • 고장완·박수미·유현숙(2014). 대학생의 학습성과와 대학특성 및 학습과정 변인 간의 구조적 관계 분석. 한국교육, 41(1), 167-195. (Translated in English) Ko, J., Park, S., & Yu, H. (2014). An analysis of the structural relationships between student learning outcomes and institutional characteristics and student engagement. The Journal of Korean Education, 41(1), 167-195.
  • 이병식·공희정·김혜림(2013). 대학생의 진로역량개발에 대한 대학 특성 요인의 영향 분석: 층위 간 상호작용효과를 중심으로. 교육학 연구, 51(4), 213-247. (Translated in English) Rhee, B. S., Gong, H. J., & Kim, H. R. (2013). Investigating differential influences of institutional features on career competency development of college students: A multilevel approach. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 213-247.
  • 김은경(2005). 교수-학생 상호작용이 대학생의 성장 및 발달에 미치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 19(4), 877-895. (Translated in English) Kim, E. K. (2008). Effects of student-faculty interaction on college student outcomes and development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(4), 877-895.
  • 박수미·고장완(2014). 대학생의 근로 경험에 다른 학생 참여와 학습 성과 분석. 교육행정학연구, 32(3), 149-175. (Translated in English) Park, S., & Ko, J. (2014). The effect of work and internship experiences on student engagement and learning outcomes. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 32(3), 149-175.
  • 박수미·고장완(2015). 대학생 다양성 경험(diversity experiences)에 대한 영향 요인과 다양성 경험의 차이에 대한 두 대학 사례 비교 분석. 교육행정학연구, 33(2), 319-342. (Translated in English) Park, S., & Ko, J. (2015). Factors affecting diversity experiences of college students: An analysis of institutional difference. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 33(2), 319-342.
  • 배상훈·김혜정(2013). 대학의 학업지원, 교수-학생 교류, 능동적·협동적 학습 및 학업도전의 구조 적 관계 분석. 열린교육연구, 21(4), 201-225. (Translated in English) Bae, S., & Kim, H. (2013). Influential factors for the academic challenge of university students: Mutual impact of learning supportive environment, student-faculty interaction, and active and collaborative learning. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 21(4), 201-225.
  • 배상훈·홍지인(2015). 대학 특성이 대학생의 능동적, 협동적 학습참여 및 교수-학생 상호작용의 성장에 미치는 영향: 대학 간(Between -Institution) 효과 분석. 교육학연구, 53(4), 159-192. (Translated in English) Bae, S., & Hong, J. I. (2015). Institutional factors affecting the growth of active, collaborative student engagement and student-faculty interaction: between-institution effects. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), 159-192.
  • 유현숙·고장완·임후남(2011). 대학생의 의사소통능력 및 종합적 사고력에 영향을 주는 학습과정 요인 분석. 교육행정학연구, 29(4), 319-337. (Translated in English) Yu, H., Ko, J., & Lim, H. (2011). Examining learning experiences influencing on the communication skills and high-order thinking skills. The Journal of Educational Administration, 29(4), 319-337.
  • 유현숙·임후남·서영인·고장완·신현석·박승호(2011). 한국 대학생의 학습과정 분석 연구(II). 한국 교육개발원. (Translated in English) Yu, H., Lim, H., Seo, Y., Shin, H., Ko, J., & Park, S. (2011). An Analysis of Learning Process of Korean College Students (II). Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 유현숙·임후남·최정윤·서영인·신현석·고장완(2012). 한국 대학생의 학습과정 분석연구 (III). 서울: 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Yu, H., Lim, H., Choi, J., Seo, Y., Shin, H., & Ko, J. (2012). An Analysis of Learning Process of Korean College Students (III). Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 유현숙·이정미·최정윤·김민희·변현정·최보금(2013). 대학의 교수·학습 질 제고 전략 탐색 연구 (I). 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Yu, H., Lee, J., Choi, J., Kim, M., Byun, H., & Choi, B. (2013). Strategic Planning for the Advancement of the Teaching-Learning Quality in Higher Education (Ⅰ) . Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 유현숙·이정미·최정윤·김은영·김민희·변현정·최보금·이길재(2014). 대학의 교수·학습 질 제고 전략 탐색 연구(II) -4년제 대학의 교수·학습 역량진단-. 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Yu, H., Lee, J., Choi, J., Kim, E., Kim, M., Byun, H., Choi, B., & Lee, G. (2014). Strategic Planning for the Advancement of the Teaching-Learning Quality in Higher Education (Ⅱ) . Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 유현숙·김은영·서영인·이정미·최정윤·김민희·이길재·변현정·최보금(2015). 대학의 교수·학습 질 제고 전략 탐색 연구(III) -대학 유형별 교수·학습 역량 평가(체제) 다양화: 4년제, 전문대학-. 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Yu, H., Kim, E., Seo. Y., Lee, J., Choi, J., Kim, M., Lee, G. Byun, H., & Choi, B. (2015). Strategic Planning for the Advancement of the Teaching-Learning Quality in Higher Education (Ⅲ) . Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 이병식·최정윤(2008). 다층모형을 활용한 대학생 핵심능력 개발의 영향요인 분석: 대학교육 과정과 대학 특성 변인의 영향. 한국교육, 35(2), 243-266. (Translated in English) Rhee, B. & Choi, J. (2008). Analyzing influences on the perceived development of core competencies of college students: A multilevel approach. Journal of Korean Education, 35(2), 243-266.
  • 조문흠·변문경(2015). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)을 활용한 대학 정규수업에서 학습자의 동기유형별 학습 패턴 분석. 교육학연구, 53(4), 194-223. (Translated in English) Cho, M. & Byun, M. (2015). College students’ motivation and learning patterns in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Korean Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), 194-223.
  • 최보금(2016). 교수-학생 상호작용 변화에 영향을 미치는 대학생 특성 및 대학 초기 경험 분석. 한국교육, 43(1), 185-208. (Translated in English) Choi, B. K. (2016). Estimating change in student-faculty interaction: Test of the effects of student characteristics and early college experiences. The Journal of Korean Education, 43(1), 185-208.
  • 최정윤·신혜숙(2010). 한국 대학에서의 교수-학생 상호작용의 성격과 대학교육 학습성과에 대한 영향 분석: 대학 특성 효과 분석을 중심으로. 한국교육, 37(2), 131-154. (Translated in English) Choi, J. & Shin, H. (2010). The nature and effects of student-faculty interaction on higher education learning outcomes in Korean universities: Focusing on effects of institutional characteristics. The Journal of Korean Education, 37(2), 131-154.
  • 최정윤·이병식(2009). 대학생의 학습성과에 대한 영향 요인 탐색: 대학의 효과 분석을 중심으로. 교육행정학연구, 27(1), 199-222. (Translated in English) Choi, J. & Rhee, B. S. (2009). Examining factors related to college students’ learning outcomes: Focusing on effects of college. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 27(1), 199-222.
  • 홍지인·배상훈(2015). 교수-학생 상호작용이 대학생의 대학 몰입에 미치는 영향. 교육행정학연구, 33(3), 351-379. (Translated in English) Hong, J. I., & Bae, S. (2015). The Relationship between Faculty-Student Interaction and Institutional Commitment of Students. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 33(3), 351-379.
  • Anaya, G., & Cole, D. G. (2001). Latina/o student achievement: Exploring the influence of student-faculty interactions on college grades. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 3-14.
  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bean, J. P., & Kuh, G. D. (1984). The reciprocity between student-faculty informal contact and academic performance of university undergraduate students. Research in Higher Education, 21(4), 461-477.
  • Chang, J. C. (2005). Faculty student interaction at the community college: A focus on students of color. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 769-802.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39, 3-7.
  • Cotten, S. R., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student–faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51(4), 487-519.
  • CSEQ. (n.d.). College Student Experiences Questionnaire. http://cseq.indiana.edu /pdf/cseq_pdf. 에서 2016. 4. 27 인출.
  • Endo, J. J., & Harpel, R. L. (1982). The effect of student-faculty interaction on students' educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 115-138.
  • Kim, Y., & Sax, L. (2009). Student–Faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437-459.
  • Ko, J., Park, S., Yu, H., Kim, S., & Kim, D. (2015). The structural relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes in Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 25(1), 147-157.
  • Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309-332.
  • Lundberg, C. A., & Schreiner, L. A. (2004). Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis by student race/ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 549-565.
  • NSSE. (n.d.). 2016 U.S. English Version. http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/survey_instruments/2016/NSSE_2016-US_English.pdf. 에서 2016. 4. 27 인출.
  • Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 545-595.
  • Pascarella, E. T. (1985). Students' affective development within the college environment. The Journal of Higher Education, 56(6), 640-663.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Student-faculty and student-peer relationships as mediators of the structural effects of undergraduate residence arrangement. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(6), 344-353.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. A Third Decade of Research, Vol.2. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Strauss, L. C., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Predictors of student commitment at two-year and four-year institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 203-227.
  • Thompson, M. D. (2001). Informal student-faculty interaction: Its relationship to educational gains in science and mathematics among community college students. Community College Review, 29(1), 35-57.
  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
구매하기 (6,000)